Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/12055
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
dc.creatorYang, NYH-
dc.creatorZhou, D-
dc.creatorChung, RCK-
dc.creatorLi-Tsang, CWP-
dc.creatorFong, KNK-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-14T01:28:47Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-14T01:28:47Z-
dc.identifier.issn1662-5161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/12055-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2013 Yang, Zhou, Chung, Li-Tsang and Fong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Yang NYH, Zhou D, Chung RCK, Li-Tsang CWP and Fong KNK (2013) Rehabilitation interventions for unilateral neglect after stroke: a systematic review from 1997 through 2012. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:187,1-11 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00187en_US
dc.subjectBehavioral inattention testen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectUnilateral neglecten_US
dc.titleRehabilitation interventions for unilateral neglect after stroke : a systematic review from 1997 through 2012en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage11en_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnhum.2013.00187en_US
dcterms.abstractA systematic review of the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with unilateral neglect (UN) after stroke was conducted by searching the computerized databases from 1997 through 2012. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neglect treatment strategies for stroke patients which used the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) as the primary outcome measure were eligible for inclusion. Out of 201 studies initially identified, 12 RCTs covering 277 participants were selected for analysis. All had the same weakness of lower power with smaller samples and limitation in the blindingness of the design. Prism Adaptation (PA) was the most commonly used intervention while continuous Theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) appeared to be a new approach. Meta-analysis showed that for immediate effects, the BIT conventional subscore had a significant and large mean effect size (ES=0.76; 95% CI 0.28-1.23; p=0.002) whereas the BIT total score showed a modestly significant mean ES (ES=0.55; 95% CI 0.16-0.94; p=0.006). No significant mean ES in sensitivity analysis was found for long-lasting effects across all BIT outcomes. PA appeared to be the most effective intervention based on the results of pooled analysis. More rigorous studies should be done on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) before it can be concluded that it is a promising treatment for UN.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10 May 2013, v. 7, 187, p. 1-11-
dcterms.isPartOfFrontiers in Human Neuroscience-
dcterms.issued2013-05-10-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000318629200001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84876824711-
dc.identifier.pmid23675339-
dc.identifier.artn187en_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr63248-
dc.description.ros2012-2013 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Record-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0729-n33-
dc.identifier.SubFormID1256-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-funded-
dc.description.pubStatusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yang_Rehabilitation_Unilateral_Stroke.pdf2.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

196
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

Downloads

86
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

78
Last Week
0
Last month
1
Citations as of Mar 28, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

68
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.