Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/120277
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Designen_US
dc.creatorLuis Vegaen_US
dc.creatorValle-Noronha, Jen_US
dc.creatorVega, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-30T01:54:39Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-30T01:54:39Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/120277-
dc.descriptionDRS2026, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, June 8-12, 2026en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDesign Research Societyen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Vega, L., and Valle-Noronha, J. (2026) Central but Decentered: Repositioning the Practitioner in Design Research Involving Practice, in Simeone, L., Gray, C. M., Verhoeven, A., de Götzen, A., Bakırlıoğlu, Y., Zohar, H., Stead, M., and Buwert, P. (eds.), DRS2026: Edinburgh, 8–12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdom is available at https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.128.en_US
dc.subjectDecenteringen_US
dc.subjectEntanglementen_US
dc.subjectPluralismen_US
dc.subjectPractitioner-researcheren_US
dc.titleCentral but decentered : repositioning the practitioner in design research involving practiceen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21606/drs.2026.128en_US
dcterms.abstractDesign research involving practice affords a unique mode of inquiry facilitated by acts of making, generative thinking, and iterative experimentation. The practitioner’s perspective is central because it foregrounds the significance of personal engagement with the research problem at hand. Current efforts in the field are nonetheless aiming to expand this inward-looking gaze by attending to the systemic and entangled dimensions of designing. With the increasing turn to relational, posthuman, and decolonial approaches towards that end, it becomes imperative to reconstrue what counts as ‘practice’ and reexamine whose perspectives are included in such a reconstrual. The present track brings together five contributions dealing with this issue, offering an array of theoretical, empirical, and methodological studies that illustrate how design research involving practice can fully account for the centrality of the practitioner’s perspective while also addressing the urgency to decenter it.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn L Simeone, C M Gray, A Verhoeven, A de Götzen, Y Bakırlıoğlu, H Zohar, M Stead, & P Buwert (Eds.), DRS2026: Editorials, https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.128.en_US
dcterms.issued2026-
dc.relation.conferenceDesign Research Society [DRS]en_US
dc.description.validate202607 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4466-
dc.identifier.SubFormID52851-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe work presented here was supported by the Start-up Fund for RAPs under the Strategic Hiring Scheme (UGC) of Hong Kong (Project No. P0058205). We would like to express our gratitude to all peer reviewers for their excellent and timely work, as well as our co-chairs, Laurene Vaughan, Brian Dixon, and Macarena Gaete-Cruz, for helping us make this theme track come into being.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Vega_Central_But_Decentered.pdf373.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.