Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/120199
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communication-
dc.creatorPeltonen, L-
dc.creatorHu, G-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-24T07:46:54Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-24T07:46:54Z-
dc.identifier.issn0790-8318-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/120199-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.subjectArgument-based validationen_US
dc.subjectAssessment developmenten_US
dc.subjectAssessment validationen_US
dc.subjectLinguacultural competenceen_US
dc.subjectLinguacultural competence assessmenten_US
dc.titleDeveloping and validating assessments of business professionals’ linguacultural competenceen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/07908318.2026.2691819-
dcterms.abstractInternationally operating professionals require linguacultural competence, namely the ability to communicate effectively with people from multiple linguistic and cultural backgrounds. One of the pedagogical challenges of developing learners’ linguacultural competence is how to assess it. To address this issue, a novel linguacultural competence (LCC) framework was developed to underpin the creation of two assessment tools used in an instructional program. The instruments – a self-report questionnaire and an analytic rubric for email writing tasks – were designed to assess two specific linguacultural competencies in the LCC framework: the ability to express one’s home culture and understanding how religion affects professional communication. This article reports the development and validation of these instruments according to an adapted version of the argument-based validation framework for English for professional purposes (ABV-LAPP). The data provided convincing validity evidence for the questionnaire and the rubric, despite some potential rebuttals. These results offer insight into the obstacles involved in developing novel assessments for this new construct and provide a direction for how these assessments can be revised, improved, and implemented in future studies.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLanguage, culture and curriculum, Published online: 18 Jun 2026, Latest Articles, https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2026.2691819-
dcterms.isPartOfLanguage, culture and curriculum-
dcterms.issued2026-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105042326709-
dc.identifier.eissn1747-7573-
dc.description.validate202607 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4723en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID53752en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-12-18en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-12-18
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.