Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/119987
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Language Science and Technology-
dc.creatorQiu, L-
dc.creatorChersoni, E-
dc.creatorZhou, H-
dc.creatorHsu, YY-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-17T09:20:07Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-17T09:20:07Z-
dc.identifier.isbn979-8-89176-363-0-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/119987-
dc.descriptionThe 22nd Workshop on Multiword Expressions (MWE 2026), Rabat, Marocco, March 28, 2026en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights©2026 Association for Computational Linguisticsen_US
dc.rightsLicensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Le Qiu, Emmanuele Chersoni, He Zhou, and Yu-Yin Hsu. 2026. Large Language Models Put to the Test on Chinese Noun Compounds: Experiments on Natural Language Inference and Compound Semantics. In Proceedings of the 22nd Workshop on Multiword Expressions (MWE 2026), pages 1–7, Rabat, Marocco. Association for Computational Linguistics is available at https://aclanthology.org/2026.mwe-1.1/.en_US
dc.titleLarge language models put to the test on Chinese noun compounds : experiments on natural language inference and compound semanticsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage7-
dc.identifier.doi10.18653/v1/2026.mwe-1.1-
dcterms.abstractNoun compounds are generally considered an open challenge for NLP systems, given to the difficulty of interpreting the implicit semantic relation between modifier and head, although the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) recently led to remarkable performance leaps. However, most evaluations have been carried out on English benchmarks.In our work, we test LLMs on compound semantics understanding in Chinese, adopting two different evaluation scenarios: an extrinsic evaluation in a Natural Language Inference task, and an intrinsic evaluation in which models are directly asked to predict the semantic relation linking the two constituents.Our results show that the bigger and more recent LLMs are able to surpass supervised baselines in the inference task, especially when tested under the few-shot setting. In the more challenging task of selecting the correct interpretation of the compounds out of a fine-grained typology of semantic relations between head and modifier, the best Chinese LLM (Qwen-plus) manages to select the correct option in about one third of the cases.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn Proceedings of the 22nd Workshop on Multiword Expressions (MWE 2026), p.1-7. Kerrville : Association for Computational Linguistics, 2026-
dcterms.issued2026-
dc.relation.ispartofbookProceedings of the 22nd Workshop on Multiword Expressions (MWE 2026)-
dc.relation.conferenceWorkshop on Multiword Expressions [MWE]-
dc.description.validate202607 bcwh-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4672en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID53565en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2026.mwe-1.1.pdf379.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.