Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/119979
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Language Science and Technology-
dc.creatorRadaelli, M-
dc.creatorChersoni, E-
dc.creatorLenci, A-
dc.creatorBaggio, G-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-17T09:20:01Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-17T09:20:01Z-
dc.identifier.isbn979-8-89176-316-6-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/119979-
dc.description16th International Conference on Computational Semantics, Düsseldorf, Germany, September 22-23, 2025en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAssociation for Computational Linguisticsen_US
dc.rights©2025 Association for Computational Linguisticsen_US
dc.rightsLicensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)en_US
dc.rightsThe following publicationMatteo Radaelli, Emmanuele Chersoni, Alessandro Lenci, and Giosuè Baggio. 2025. Context Effects on the Interpretation of Complement Coercion: A Comparative Study with Language Models in Norwegian. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Semantics, pages 78–88, Düsseldorf, Germany. Association for Computational Linguistics is available at https://aclanthology.org/2025.iwcs-main.7/.en_US
dc.titleContext effects on the interpretation of complement coercion : a comparative study with language models in Norwegianen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage78-
dc.identifier.epage88-
dcterms.abstractIn complement coercion sentences, like *John began the book*, a covert event (e.g., reading) may be recovered based on lexical meanings, world knowledge, and context. We investigate how context influences coercion interpretation performance for 17 language models (LMs) in Norwegian, a low-resource language. Our new dataset contained isolated coercion sentences (context-neutral), plus the same sentences with a subject NP that suggests a particular covert event and sentences that have a similar effect but that precede or follow the coercion sentence. LMs generally benefit from contextual enrichment, but performance varies depending on the model. Models that struggled in context-neutral sentences showed greater improvements from contextual enrichment. Subject NPs and pre-coercion sentences had the largest effect in facilitating coercion interpretation.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Semantics, p. 78-88. Kerrville : Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025-
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.relation.ispartofbookProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Semantics-
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference on Computational Semantics-
dc.identifier.artn78-
dc.description.validate202607 bcwh-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4672en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID53550en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2025.iwcs-main.7.pdf221.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.