Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/119682
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Hotel and Tourism Managementen_US
dc.creatorShi, XCen_US
dc.creatorLeung, XYen_US
dc.creatorBai, Ben_US
dc.creatorBuhalis, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-06T02:24:43Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-06T02:24:43Z-
dc.identifier.issn0261-5177en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/119682-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence (AI)en_US
dc.subjectEmployee selectionen_US
dc.subjectFairness heuristic theoryen_US
dc.subjectGender differencesen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational attractivenessen_US
dc.subjectSocial role theoryen_US
dc.titleArtificial intelligence-based employee selection in tourism and hospitality : justice, inclusion, and gender differences in resume screening and interviewsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume118en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tourman.2026.105478en_US
dcterms.abstractAs artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more prevalent in human resource management, its role in tourism and hospitality hiring remains underexplored. This study investigates job applicants’ perceptions of AI in employee selection, focusing on resume screening and interviews. Drawing on fairness heuristic theory and social role theory, we examine how AI affects perceived justice, inclusion, and organizational attractiveness. Four scenario-based experiments and one qualitative study were conducted with job applicants comparing AI-based and human-based selection methods. Results show that human recruiters are generally perceived as more just and inclusive, enhancing organizational attractiveness. However, gender moderates these effects: females favor AI-based resume screening, whereas males are more receptive to AI-based interviews. These findings provide insights for organizations seeking to integrate AI into employee selection while maintaining justice and inclusion. As AI becomes more prevalent in hiring, organizations should prioritize human oversight, ensuring that AI supports rather than replaces human.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTourism management, Feb. 2027, v. 118, 105478en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTourism managementen_US
dcterms.issued2027-02-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-3193en_US
dc.identifier.artn105478en_US
dc.description.validate202607 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4595-
dc.identifier.SubFormID53292-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextHotel ICON Research Funding Scheme, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong (Grant#: H-ZDJ5/P0057951).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2030-02-28en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2030-02-28
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.