Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/119192
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Designen_US
dc.creatorHu, Jen_US
dc.creatorCampbell, ADen_US
dc.creatorBaron, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-09T01:36:21Z-
dc.date.available2026-06-09T01:36:21Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/119192-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Hu, J., Campbell, A.D., and Baron, G. (2026) Scaffolding Transition Pathways: Integrating SES Resilience as a Dialogic Tool for Community-based Co-Design, in Simeone, L., Gray, C. M., Verhoeven, A., de Götzen, A., Bakırlıoğlu, Y., Zohar, H., Stead, M., and Buwert, P. (eds.), DRS2026: Edinburgh, 8–12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdom is available at https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.911.en_US
dc.subjectCo-designen_US
dc.subjectCommunityen_US
dc.subjectSocial-ecological resilienceen_US
dc.subjectTransition designen_US
dc.titleScaffolding transition pathways : integrating SES resilience as a dialogic tool for community-based co-designen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21606/drs.2026.911en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper addresses a challenge for Transition Design (TD): how to make long-term, systemic frameworks tangible and actionable in small-scale, community-led practice. We introduce and evaluate the preliminary results of a methodological framework that scaffolds TD backcasting with seven principles of Social-Ecological Systems (SES) resilience for urban gardens. Grounded in a community garden case study in Shanghai, we analyse data from semi-structured interviews and a co-design workshop to evaluate this method in practice. Our findings reveal that this method functions as a dialogic tool, enabling participants to diagnose systemic issues, negotiate trade-offs, and co-create near-term actions with a longer-term vision. The paper provides a critical analysis of the new tool, including its differential effectiveness during visioning versus action planning and presents a theoretical framework for further replication and iteration. Ultimately, this research aims to contribute a theoretically-grounded and empirically-tested method for structuring co-design processes aimed at fostering community-led sustainable transitions.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn L Simeone, CM Gray, A Verhoeven, A de Götzen, Y Bakırlıoğlu, H Zohar, M Stead, & P Buwert (eds.), DRS2026: Edinburgh, 8-12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.911en_US
dcterms.issued2026-
dc.relation.conferenceDesign Research Society [DRS]en_US
dc.description.validate202606 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4483-
dc.identifier.SubFormID52906-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusUnpublishen_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hu_Scaffolding_Transition_Pathways.pdf1.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.