Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/119192
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | School of Design | en_US |
| dc.creator | Hu, J | en_US |
| dc.creator | Campbell, AD | en_US |
| dc.creator | Baron, G | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-09T01:36:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-06-09T01:36:21Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/119192 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Hu, J., Campbell, A.D., and Baron, G. (2026) Scaffolding Transition Pathways: Integrating SES Resilience as a Dialogic Tool for Community-based Co-Design, in Simeone, L., Gray, C. M., Verhoeven, A., de Götzen, A., Bakırlıoğlu, Y., Zohar, H., Stead, M., and Buwert, P. (eds.), DRS2026: Edinburgh, 8–12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdom is available at https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.911. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Co-design | en_US |
| dc.subject | Community | en_US |
| dc.subject | Social-ecological resilience | en_US |
| dc.subject | Transition design | en_US |
| dc.title | Scaffolding transition pathways : integrating SES resilience as a dialogic tool for community-based co-design | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.21606/drs.2026.911 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | This paper addresses a challenge for Transition Design (TD): how to make long-term, systemic frameworks tangible and actionable in small-scale, community-led practice. We introduce and evaluate the preliminary results of a methodological framework that scaffolds TD backcasting with seven principles of Social-Ecological Systems (SES) resilience for urban gardens. Grounded in a community garden case study in Shanghai, we analyse data from semi-structured interviews and a co-design workshop to evaluate this method in practice. Our findings reveal that this method functions as a dialogic tool, enabling participants to diagnose systemic issues, negotiate trade-offs, and co-create near-term actions with a longer-term vision. The paper provides a critical analysis of the new tool, including its differential effectiveness during visioning versus action planning and presents a theoretical framework for further replication and iteration. Ultimately, this research aims to contribute a theoretically-grounded and empirically-tested method for structuring co-design processes aimed at fostering community-led sustainable transitions. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | In L Simeone, CM Gray, A Verhoeven, A de Götzen, Y Bakırlıoğlu, H Zohar, M Stead, & P Buwert (eds.), DRS2026: Edinburgh, 8-12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.911 | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.relation.conference | Design Research Society [DRS] | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202606 bcch | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a4483 | - |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | 52906 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Unpublish | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | CC | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Conference Paper | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu_Scaffolding_Transition_Pathways.pdf | 1.78 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



