Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/119191
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Designen_US
dc.creatorWernli, Men_US
dc.creatorChan, KFen_US
dc.creatorYu, Jen_US
dc.creatorWolper, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-09T01:16:06Z-
dc.date.available2026-06-09T01:16:06Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/119191-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wernli, M., Chan, K., Yu, J., and Wolper, J. (2026) The meandering practitioner: When research emerges in relational resistance and intentional ambiguity, in Simeone, L., Gray, C. M., Verhoeven, A., de Götzen, A., Bakırlıoğlu, Y., Zohar, H., Stead, M., and Buwert, P. (eds.), DRS2026: Edinburgh, 8–12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdom is available at https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.811.en_US
dc.subjectAgential realismen_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectPractitioner dispositionen_US
dc.subjectSoil practicesen_US
dc.titleThe meandering practitioner : when research emerges in relational resistance and intentional ambiguityen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21606/drs.2026.811en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper theorizes meandering as a dispositional heuristic in design research, foregrounding how researchers can encounter complexity through nuanced, situated journeying. Drawing on the case of SoilTrust nutrient-cycling praxis in Hong Kong, the study identifies four key dispositions – nimble resistance, contextual reasoning, temporal suppleness, and deliberate ambiguity – that enable practitioners to respond to structural challenges with humility, curiosity, and strategic indirection. Rather than pursuing fixed goals, meandering researchers cultivate relational awareness, embrace uncertainty, and reconfigure material and social systems through iterative, practice-led inquiry. Anchored in agential realism and indirect action, meanderability reframes design as a life-embedded mode of inquiry that honors entanglement, resistance, and unpredictability. Meanderability as a situated heuristic is the practitioner’s capacity to meander and be meandered simultaneously: as we shape our milieu – organismically, materially, socially, customarily, and deliberatively – the milieu reshapes our relational constitution, movement, habit, and potentiality.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn L Simeone, CM Gray, A Verhoeven, A de Götzen, Y Bakırlıoğlu, H Zohar, M Stead, & P Buwert (eds.), DRS2026: Edinburgh, 8-12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.811en_US
dcterms.issued2026-
dc.relation.ispartofbookDRS2026: Edinburgh, 8-12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdomen_US
dc.relation.conferenceDesign Research Society [DRS]en_US
dc.description.validate202606 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4482-
dc.identifier.SubFormID52899-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wernli_Meandering_Practitioner_When.pdf1.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.