Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118742
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorWang, C-
dc.creatorLiu, H-
dc.creatorLuo, M-
dc.creatorGao, K-
dc.creatorZhu, J-
dc.creatorZeng, K-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-15T09:00:56Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-15T09:00:56Z-
dc.identifier.issn0266-1144-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118742-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectBridge approachen_US
dc.subjectField instrumentationen_US
dc.subjectGeogridsen_US
dc.subjectHighly compressible foundation soilsen_US
dc.subjectRetaining wallen_US
dc.titleField behavior of a GRS bridge approach retaining wall on highly compressible foundation soilsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage630-
dc.identifier.epage641-
dc.identifier.volume53-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.12.007-
dcterms.abstractTo reveal the behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) bridge approach retaining walls on highly compressible foundation soils, in this study, a GRS bridge approach adjacent to the Yangtze River was monitored for approximately 3 years during construction and post-construction. The settlement of the GRS bridge approach, the vertical earth pressure at the base of the backfill soil, and the reinforcement deformation were monitored. The monitoring points were arranged on the left and right sides of a cross-section and a longitudinal section at the mid-span. The results showed that the settlement of the GRS bridge approach was large and uneven, and the settlement rates were influenced by the water level of the Yangtze River. Due to the large and differential settlement, the distributions of the vertical earth pressure and geogrid reinforcement strain for a retaining wall constructed on highly compressible foundation soils were different from those for a retaining wall constructed on stable foundation soils. The overall GRS bridge approach performed well with large settlements, with only some minor structural problems in the facing of the retaining wall. This indicated that the flexible GRS bridge approach was a good choice when the retaining wall was constructed on highly compressible foundation soils.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGeotextiles and geomembranes, Apr. 2025, v. 53, no. 2, p. 630-641-
dcterms.isPartOfGeotextiles and geomembranes-
dcterms.issued2025-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85213520269-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-3584-
dc.description.validate202605 bcjz-
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001647/2026-03en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-04-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-04-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.