Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118654
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorXu, Jen_US
dc.creatorDeng, Len_US
dc.creatorGao, Yen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Wen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-06T08:06:31Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-06T08:06:31Z-
dc.identifier.issn0968-090Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118654-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectDemand uncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectHigh-speed railwayen_US
dc.subjectOverbookingen_US
dc.subjectPricing and seat allocationen_US
dc.subjectProgressive hedging algorithmen_US
dc.subjectSurrogate-based modelen_US
dc.titleJoint optimization of pricing, seat allocation and overbooking for high-speed railway system under demand uncertaintyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume183en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trc.2025.105492en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper examines the integrated optimization of pricing, seat allocation, and overbooking strategies in high-speed railway (HSR) operations. Overbooking helps address inefficiencies arising from empty seats due to passenger no-shows or last-minute cancellations. The complexity of the problem stems from two main factors: (i) the interdependence of pricing, seat allocation, and overbooking decisions, which jointly influence railway system performance; and (ii) the uncertainties associated with passenger demand and no-show behavior. To tackle these complexities, we develop a two-stage stochastic programming model aimed at maximizing expected railway profit. In the first stage, the model determines HSR pricing and seat allocation, including overbooking, while the second stage addresses potential denied boarding due to overbooking, based on the first-stage decisions. To solve the model, we employ a sample average approximation method and introduce a tailored progressive hedging algorithm (PHA). Additionally, we adapt commonly used surrogate-based optimization methods, such as Kriging and radial basis function models, for comparative analysis. Numerical studies on both a small-scale example and a real-world HSR line reveal that the proposed joint optimization significantly boosts railway profit across various demand and no-show scenarios, with the PHA solution approach outperforming surrogate-based methods in terms of both solution quality and computational efficiency.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Feb. 2026, v. 183, 105492en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTransportation research. Part C, Emerging technologiesen_US
dcterms.issued2026-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105029773345-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2359en_US
dc.identifier.artn105492en_US
dc.description.validate202605 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001555/2026-04-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe authors thank the anonymous referees very much for their useful comments, which helped improve this paper substantially. This research was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52372300, 72301228), Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (15204623), MTR Research Funding Scheme (PTU-24016), and Beijing Jiaotong University Natural Science Siyuan Postdoctoral Research Initiation Foundation (KTXKBH25001532).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2028-02-29en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2028-02-29
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.