Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118411
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorHussain, Men_US
dc.creatorYe, Zen_US
dc.creatorChi, HLen_US
dc.creatorHsu, SCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-14T06:24:33Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-14T06:24:33Z-
dc.identifier.issn0926-5805en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118411-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCascade learningen_US
dc.subjectComputer visionen_US
dc.subjectCrane operational risk classificationen_US
dc.subjectSafety risk assessmenten_US
dc.subjectSmart site safety systemen_US
dc.titleAutomated safety risk assessment for crane operations using cascade learningen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume181en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106686en_US
dcterms.abstractConstruction machinery enhances productivity and ensures project timelines. However, equipment failure poses significant risks, including injuries, fatalities, and financial losses. Traditional safety assessments rely on manual reporting and are prone to errors, delays, and inconsistencies. This paper introduced a cascade learning technique for automated safety risk assessment in crane operations, ensuring reliable, accurate, and adaptable evaluations. The cascade model detects cranes, classifies safety statuses and activities, and computes risk values using confidence scores and impact factors. A risk threshold of 0.52 triggers real-time alerts for intervention. Video-feed analysis supports continuous monitoring and documentation. Expert validation confirmed the practicality of the risk-quantification models. The model achieved 92.10 % precision in crane detection, 99.25 % accuracy in safety classification, and 99.47 % accuracy in activity classification, with an inference time of 0.70 s. This approach enhances Smart Site Safety System (4S) technologies, automates safety assessments, and contributes to improved construction safety standards.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAutomation in construction, Jan. 2026, v. 181, pt. C, 106686en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAutomation in constructionen_US
dcterms.issued2026-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105030332255-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-7891en_US
dc.identifier.artn106686en_US
dc.description.validate202604 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001480/2026-04-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe authors would like to thank the Research Grants Council for its funding support under the General Research Fund (PolyU 15223322). The authors also express their gratitude to The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) for supporting the first author through the Hong Kong Polytechnic University Presidential Ph.D. Fellowship Scheme (PPPFS). Furthermore, the authors appreciate PolyU for providing the University Big Data Analysis (UBDA) and High-Performance Computing (HPC) platforms, which were essential for training the models.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2028-01-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2028-01-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.