Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118364
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of English and Communication | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ye, X | en_US |
| dc.creator | Hu, G | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-09T06:57:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-09T06:57:38Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118364 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ideal L2 self | en_US |
| dc.subject | L2 learning experience | en_US |
| dc.subject | L2 motivational strategies | en_US |
| dc.subject | Motivational interventions | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ought-to L2 self | en_US |
| dc.title | The effects of three motivational interventions on EFL learners’ L2MSS : a longitudinal perspective | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 129 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.system.2024.103584 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | This paper reports on an empirical investigation into the effects of three motivational interventions on Chinese junior secondary EFL students' L2 motivational self system (L2MSS: ideal L2 self, ought-to L2 self, and L2 learning experience). The study employed a quasi-experimental design with pre-post-delayed questionnaire surveys involving four groups: a control group without motivational training, and three treatment groups receiving either traditional motivational strategies (MSs), vision-based MSs, or a combination of both types of MS. The selection of MSs for the interventions was based on student preferences identified in a pilot study. A total of 391 students completed a questionnaire administered at three time points to gauge changes to their L2MSS. Within-group comparisons indicated that all three motivational treatments significantly improved participants’ L2MSS immediately after the interventions. All three interventions demonstrated sustained effects on the ideal L2 self and the ought-to L2 self, whereas only the combined MS treatment had a lasting impact on the L2 learning experience. Between-groups comparisons revealed that the ideal L2 self was most influenced by vision-based MSs, followed by combined MSs and traditional MSs. The combined MS treatment outperformed the other two treatments in the effects on the ought-to L2 self and the L2 learning experience. The implications and limitations of the study are discussed. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | embargoed access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | System, Apr. 2025, v. 129, 103584 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | System | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2025-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85213289334 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2079-8954 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.artn | 103584 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202604 bchy | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Not applicable | en_US |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | G001444/2025-12 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.date.embargo | 2027-04-30 | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AO) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



