Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118364
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communicationen_US
dc.creatorYe, Xen_US
dc.creatorHu, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-09T06:57:38Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-09T06:57:38Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118364-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectIdeal L2 selfen_US
dc.subjectL2 learning experienceen_US
dc.subjectL2 motivational strategiesen_US
dc.subjectMotivational interventionsen_US
dc.subjectOught-to L2 selfen_US
dc.titleThe effects of three motivational interventions on EFL learners’ L2MSS : a longitudinal perspectiveen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume129en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.system.2024.103584en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper reports on an empirical investigation into the effects of three motivational interventions on Chinese junior secondary EFL students' L2 motivational self system (L2MSS: ideal L2 self, ought-to L2 self, and L2 learning experience). The study employed a quasi-experimental design with pre-post-delayed questionnaire surveys involving four groups: a control group without motivational training, and three treatment groups receiving either traditional motivational strategies (MSs), vision-based MSs, or a combination of both types of MS. The selection of MSs for the interventions was based on student preferences identified in a pilot study. A total of 391 students completed a questionnaire administered at three time points to gauge changes to their L2MSS. Within-group comparisons indicated that all three motivational treatments significantly improved participants’ L2MSS immediately after the interventions. All three interventions demonstrated sustained effects on the ideal L2 self and the ought-to L2 self, whereas only the combined MS treatment had a lasting impact on the L2 learning experience. Between-groups comparisons revealed that the ideal L2 self was most influenced by vision-based MSs, followed by combined MSs and traditional MSs. The combined MS treatment outperformed the other two treatments in the effects on the ought-to L2 self and the L2 learning experience. The implications and limitations of the study are discussed.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSystem, Apr. 2025, v. 129, 103584en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSystemen_US
dcterms.issued2025-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85213289334-
dc.identifier.eissn2079-8954en_US
dc.identifier.artn103584en_US
dc.description.validate202604 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001444/2025-12-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-04-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AO)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-04-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.