Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118342
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorChai, Fen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Ben_US
dc.creatorXue, Jen_US
dc.creatorDuffy, Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-08T03:31:16Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-08T03:31:16Z-
dc.identifier.issn0266-352Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118342-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectDEM-FDM coupling, layered soilen_US
dc.subjectDirect CPT-based methoden_US
dc.subjectPile base capacityen_US
dc.subjectScale effecten_US
dc.titleAssessing direct CPT-based methods for predicting pile base resistance using coupled DEM-FDM simulationsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume183en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107230en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study utilises parallel discrete element method (DEM) simulations of cone penetration tests (CPTs) and pile load tests to investigate the application of direct CPT-based methods for predicting the base capacity of bored piles in layered soils. To reduce boundary effects, a coupled DEM-finite difference method (FDM) model is constructed to simulate pile load tests. The study focuses on the scale effect of pile diameter on the correction factor α<inf>b</inf> and the effectiveness of existing q<inf>c</inf> averaging methods in layered soils. Two pile diameters and three soil layering conditions, featuring a single silt layer interbedded within sand at varying depths, are considered in the simulations. Results show that both soil layering and pile displacement influence the scale effect. At small settlements (s) up to 0.3 times the pile diameter (D), the scale effect is insignificant, except when a soft layer is directly above the pile tip. At larger settlements, particularly when s > 0.5D, piles with smaller diameters show more pronounced reductions in base resistance due to a weak layer closely beneath the tip. Among the four methods evaluated, the BD-18 q<inf>c</inf> averaging method produces more consistent α<inf>b</inf> values across various soil profiles and pile diameters. Microscopic analysis reveals that soils above the tip contribute less to the pile base resistance at s/D = 0.1 than to the cone tip resistance. Additionally, the strength mobilisation levels of soils in most soil layering conditions appear similar at s/D = 0.1, supporting the proposal of a constant α<inf>b</inf> value in direct CPT-based methods.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationComputers and geotechnics, July 2025, v. 183, 107230en_US
dcterms.isPartOfComputers and geotechnicsen_US
dcterms.issued2025-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105001505131-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7633en_US
dc.identifier.artn107230en_US
dc.description.validate202604 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001435/2026-03-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe first author received scholarships from UNSW for his PhD research.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-07-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-07-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.