Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118313
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Language Science and Technologyen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Men_US
dc.creatorLi, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-01T08:23:56Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-01T08:23:56Z-
dc.identifier.issn0957-9265en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118313-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Liu, M., & Li, J. (2026). When science communication meets politics: A corpus-assisted discourse study of the Congressional hearing on TikTok. Discourse & Society, 37(1), 109-132. Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). DOI: 10.1177/09579265251335034.en_US
dc.subjectBlame-avoidingen_US
dc.subjectCongressional hearingen_US
dc.subjectCorpus-assisted discourse studyen_US
dc.subjectCritical discourse analysisen_US
dc.subjectTikToken_US
dc.titleWhen science communication meets politics : a corpus-assisted discourse study of the congressional hearing on TikToken_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage109en_US
dc.identifier.epage132en_US
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/09579265251335034en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study incorporates text mining into critical discourse analysis to give a corpus-assisted discourse study of the Congressional hearing on TikTok. Topic modeling reveals two main concerns: TikTok’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its digital management practices. Co-occurrence network analysis shows Republicans prioritized political matters, whereas Democrats focused on technical and managerial issues. Manual analysis finds that Chew’s responses show the preference for denying strategies, though tactics varied by question types. This explains U.S. media’s criticism of Shouzi Chew’s uncooperative attitude and underscores the increasing intertwinement of science communication and politics in Congressional hearings.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDiscourse & society, Jan. 2026, v. 37, no. 1, p. 109-132en_US
dcterms.isPartOfDiscourse & societyen_US
dcterms.issued2026-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105004471347-
dc.identifier.eissn1460-3624en_US
dc.description.validate202604 bcjzen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001385/2025-12-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (ID No.: 4-ZZSP).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Liu_When_Science_Communication.pdfPre-Published version554.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.