Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118171
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorFan, Y-
dc.creatorFu, Y-
dc.creatorYang, Z-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-20T07:19:47Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-20T07:19:47Z-
dc.identifier.issn0167-2681-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118171-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.subjectAgenten_US
dc.subjectProperty showingen_US
dc.subjectRental marketen_US
dc.subjectSearch diversionen_US
dc.titleTour detour : intermediaries’ search diversion in rental marketsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume236-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107125-
dcterms.abstractThis paper investigates how intermediaries with information advantages divert consumers’ search in rental markets and lead to inefficient outcomes. Using unique data on tenants’ initial preferences, property-showing sequences, and transaction records, we find that agents present suboptimal properties as the first option in property-showing sequences. Leveraging such door-in-the-face tactics, agents further guide tenants’ choices through sequential adjustments. These diversion strategies are robust to exogenous shocks, market variations, and platform externalities. Such search diversion is a dominant strategy through which intermediaries benefit from an increasing transaction success rate, and transaction acceleration and increased transaction prices of suboptimal properties. However, search diversion leads to rental contracts offering unsatisfactory prices and quality, resulting in perceived utility losses for the diverted tenants, subjecting tenants to discrimination.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of economic behavior & organization, Aug. 2025, v. 236, 107125-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of economic behavior & organization-
dcterms.issued2025-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105009088399-
dc.identifier.artn107125-
dc.description.validate202603 bcjz-
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001273/2026-02en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe work described in this paper was substantially supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No.PolyU 25226423). The work is also partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.72203191) and the Peking University-Lincoln Institute Center for Urban Development and Land Policy Research Paper Fellowship Program.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2028-08-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2028-08-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.