Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118171
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Building and Real Estate | - |
| dc.creator | Fan, Y | - |
| dc.creator | Fu, Y | - |
| dc.creator | Yang, Z | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-20T07:19:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-20T07:19:47Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0167-2681 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118171 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | en_US |
| dc.subject | Agent | en_US |
| dc.subject | Property showing | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rental market | en_US |
| dc.subject | Search diversion | en_US |
| dc.title | Tour detour : intermediaries’ search diversion in rental markets | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 236 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107125 | - |
| dcterms.abstract | This paper investigates how intermediaries with information advantages divert consumers’ search in rental markets and lead to inefficient outcomes. Using unique data on tenants’ initial preferences, property-showing sequences, and transaction records, we find that agents present suboptimal properties as the first option in property-showing sequences. Leveraging such door-in-the-face tactics, agents further guide tenants’ choices through sequential adjustments. These diversion strategies are robust to exogenous shocks, market variations, and platform externalities. Such search diversion is a dominant strategy through which intermediaries benefit from an increasing transaction success rate, and transaction acceleration and increased transaction prices of suboptimal properties. However, search diversion leads to rental contracts offering unsatisfactory prices and quality, resulting in perceived utility losses for the diverted tenants, subjecting tenants to discrimination. | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | embargoed access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Journal of economic behavior & organization, Aug. 2025, v. 236, 107125 | - |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Journal of economic behavior & organization | - |
| dcterms.issued | 2025-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105009088399 | - |
| dc.identifier.artn | 107125 | - |
| dc.description.validate | 202603 bcjz | - |
| dc.description.oa | Not applicable | en_US |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | G001273/2026-02 | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | The work described in this paper was substantially supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No.PolyU 25226423). The work is also partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.72203191) and the Peking University-Lincoln Institute Center for Urban Development and Land Policy Research Paper Fellowship Program. | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.date.embargo | 2028-08-31 | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



