Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118144
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorWu, SDen_US
dc.creatorYin, ZYen_US
dc.creatorPeng, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-19T02:21:39Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-19T02:21:39Z-
dc.identifier.issn0029-8018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118144-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectFailure envelopeen_US
dc.subjectFinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectFoundationen_US
dc.subjectSwipe methoden_US
dc.titleA direct FEA loading approach for combined failure envelope of foundations in cohesive soilen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume342en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.122962en_US
dcterms.abstractFoundations, particularly offshore foundations, are subjected to multidirectional combined loading, making accurate failure envelopes essential for geotechnical design. Traditional methods for constructing these envelopes face significant challenges. This study presents a Direct Displacement Swipe (DDS) method that indirectly steers the displacement-space trajectory to conform to a prescribed load-space trajectory, implemented within a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) framework to improve accuracy and computational efficiency. Different from conventional swipe method, a truss element is used to simulate the rope, with one end connecting to the foundation and the other end for loading, resulting in the same direction of displacement and load. Validation across various types of foundations, including circular surface footings, suction caissons, tripod buckets, and composite pile-bucket foundations, covering a range of shallow to deep foundation categories, under diverse cohesive soil conditions, highlights its robustness. Comparative analysis shows the DDS method matches the accuracy of traditional approaches while significantly reducing computational costs. Additionally, it effectively captures both symmetrical and asymmetrical failure envelopes, where traditional methods often fall short. Therefore, the DDS method emerges as a practical, efficient, and reliable alternative for geotechnical design.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOcean engineering, 30 Dec. 2025, v. 342, pt. 3, 122962en_US
dcterms.isPartOfOcean engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2025-12-30-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105018302086-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5258en_US
dc.identifier.artn122962en_US
dc.description.validate202603 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001267/2026-02-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis research is financially supported by the Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (HKSARG) of China (Grant No.: 15232224).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-12-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-12-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.