Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118141
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.contributorMental Health Research Centreen_US
dc.creatorLi, Ben_US
dc.creatorChen, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-19T01:55:12Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-19T01:55:12Z-
dc.identifier.issn1320-7881en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118141-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectCommunity nursingen_US
dc.subjectNurse-patient relationshipsen_US
dc.subjectPoweren_US
dc.subjectPrimary careen_US
dc.subjectReciprocityen_US
dc.titleReciprocal power : nurse-patient interactions in primary careen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nin.70053en_US
dcterms.abstractNurses are often perceived as dominant figures in patient interactions due to their specialised knowledge and institutional authority, particularly in hospital settings. This article challenges that perspective by examining nurse–patient dynamics in primary care through the lens of reciprocity—a relational concept centred on mutual exchange and interdependence. Drawing on an interpretive case study conducted in Shenzhen, China, involving 18 community nurses and 20 patients with chronic conditions, the study identifies two key dimensions of reciprocity: expertise–trust and social networking. These are supported by three mechanisms: reciprocal recognition as an antecedent, a policy-driven culture of reciprocity and perceived equivalence in interactions. While acknowledging the persistence of asymmetry, we argue that reciprocity fosters more collaborative and responsive exchanges in community settings. This perspective offers a more nuanced and balanced understanding of power in healthcare, re-framing nurse–patient relationships as interdependent rather than unidirectional. Findings highlight the importance of nurse education that integrates relational and technical skills, and of policies that promote community-based care and sustained interactions to build trust and reciprocity—while also advancing theory by framing power as dynamic and negotiated.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNursing inquiry, Oct. 2025, v. 32, no. 4, e70053en_US
dcterms.isPartOfNursing inquiryen_US
dcterms.issued2025-10-
dc.identifier.eissn1440-1800en_US
dc.identifier.artne70053en_US
dc.description.validate202603 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4343-
dc.identifier.SubFormID52612-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis study was supported by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University Mental Health Research Centre (P0040455).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-10-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-10-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.