Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118140
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributorMainland Development Officeen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Zen_US
dc.creatorWang, Hen_US
dc.creatorLi, Jen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Zen_US
dc.creatorTang, Hen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-19T01:30:03Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-19T01:30:03Z-
dc.identifier.issn0889-9746en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118140-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Pressen_US
dc.subjectEnergy harvesten_US
dc.subjectFlexible membraneen_US
dc.subjectFlow-induced flappingen_US
dc.titleDynamics and energies of a wall-clamped flexible membrane in two different cross-flowsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume139en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2025.104436en_US
dcterms.abstractIn order to provide useful guidelines for optimizing piezoelectric energy harvesting designs under near-wall conditions, we experimentally investigate and compare the dynamics and energies of a wall-clamped flexible membrane (FM) in two different cross-flows, i.e., a separated flow induced by a forward-facing step (FFS) and a boundary layer (BL) flow, aiming at revealing the combined effects of the incoming flow and wall contact on flapping dynamics. Four dynamic modes were identified in both the FFS and BL cases by varying flow velocity and FM length: quasi-steady, regular-flapping, tip-contact, and body-contact modes. In the FFS cases, the recirculation zone induced by the step prevents the FM from lodging, whereas in the BL cases, the FM exhibits suppressed amplitudes and near-wall flapping behavior. The evolution of the two contact modes was examined in details, and the variations in contact time and contact distance during the transition between these two modes were quantitatively evaluated. Three-dimensional effects manifest differently in each case, with the FFS showing primarily spanwise bending and the BL case exhibiting pronounced twisting that impacts flapping stability. Energy analysis further reveals that, at high flow velocity, the FM's kinetic energy dominates over elastic strain energy, with significant energy dissipation occurring during wall contact.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of fluids and structures, Dec. 2025, v. 139, 104436en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of fluids and structuresen_US
dcterms.issued2025-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105017852600-
dc.identifier.eissn1095-8622en_US
dc.identifier.artn104436en_US
dc.description.validate202603 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001263/2026-02-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52078505), the postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (Grant No GZC20242040), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Shenzhen Research Institute (Grant No J2023A011), and the Joint PhD Supervision Scheme from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (P0051018).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-12-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-12-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.