Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118117
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.creatorRuan, JYen_US
dc.creatorYeung, WFen_US
dc.creatorYu, BYMen_US
dc.creatorChung, KFen_US
dc.creatorHo, FYYen_US
dc.creatorLo, HKYen_US
dc.creatorSu, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-17T08:40:33Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-17T08:40:33Z-
dc.identifier.issn2352-7218en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118117-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.en_US
dc.subjectChineseen_US
dc.subjectQuestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectSleepen_US
dc.subjectSleep healthen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.titleA translation and validation study of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED scale in Chinese Hong Kong residentsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage390en_US
dc.identifier.epage398en_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.sleh.2025.03.010en_US
dcterms.abstractObjective: The Regularity, Satisfaction, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency, and Duration (RU-SATED) version 4.0 is a 6-item tool designed to evaluate sleep health. This study examined the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED (RU-SATED-TC) scale.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on December 9, 2023 for 4 weeks. Participants were recruited via a Facebook page to complete an online questionnaire assessing sleep, mental, and physical health. The RU-SATED-TC uses a 5-point Likert scale, with a total score range from 0-24. The psychometric properties of the RU-SATED-TC, including internal consistency, concurrent validity, 1-week test-retest reliability, and factor analysis, were evaluated.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: A total of 1043 participants (67.3% female, 55.9% aged 18-39) completed the survey. The average RU-SATED-TC scale score was 12.24 (SD = 3.53). Confirmatory factor analyses showed an acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.09, and SRMR = 0.04), supporting a two-factor structure of “consistency and effectiveness” and “timing.” “Efficiency” did not load on any factors. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.608, with corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.099-0.530. The “timing” item showed the weakest item-total and concurrent correlations with other sleep outcome measures. The 1-week test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICCs ranging from 0.605-0.843), except for item 4 (efficiency), which had fair reliability (ICC = 0.464).en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusion: The RU-SATED-TC scale appears to be a reliable valid tool for measuring sleep health in Chinese Hong Kong residents. Nevertheless, future research may be needed to refine the “timing” item.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSleep health, June 2025, v. 11, no. 3, p. 390-398en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSleep healthen_US
dcterms.issued2025-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105004645048-
dc.identifier.pmid40335392-
dc.identifier.eissn2352-7226en_US
dc.description.validate202603 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001246/2025-12-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-06-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-06-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of May 8, 2026

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Citations as of Apr 23, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.