Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118096
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorMansoor, Uen_US
dc.creatorChen, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-16T02:05:06Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-16T02:05:06Z-
dc.identifier.issn1524-9050en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118096-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen_US
dc.subjectCooperative game theoryen_US
dc.subjectCritical linksen_US
dc.subjectFlow-dependent safety metricen_US
dc.subjectShapley valueen_US
dc.subjectStochastic user equilibriumen_US
dc.titleSafety-based vulnerability assessment for identifying critical road links : a cooperative game theory approachen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TITS.2026.3661624en_US
dcterms.abstractRoad traffic crashes are a major global cause of fatalities and serious injuries. Identifying safety-critical links during transportation planning can help mitigate these risks proactively. While conventional safety approaches rank links based on crash frequency, this study introduces a network vulnerability perspective to assess link importance. This new perspective shifts the focus from evaluating the local impact of crashes on individual links to assessing each link’s contribution to overall network safety. Unlike previous research that evaluates link safety contribution in isolation, this study adopts a cooperative game theory framework to account for cooperative interactions among links. The Shapley value, a solution concept from cooperative game theory, is employed to quantify the importance of each link, treating links as players. To account for the flow-dependent nature of road safety, we utilize a safety evaluation metric that calculates the utility of a cooperative game within a stochastic user equilibrium (SUE) model. This approach calculates the average marginal contribution of links to network safety across all possible link coalitions, accounting for traffic interactions rather than considering only their marginal contribution (MC) to the grand coalition. Numerical experiments highlight the advantages of the proposed approach by comparing Shapley value-based rankings with those derived from MC alone. Results show that the Shapley value more comprehensively captures link-level safety contributions, offering planners a useful framework for identifying critical links and prioritizing interventions to enhance network safety during the planning stage.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, Date of Publication: 16 February 2026, Early Access, https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2026.3661624en_US
dcterms.isPartOfIEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systemsen_US
dcterms.issued2026-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-0016en_US
dc.description.validate202603 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4335-
dc.identifier.SubFormID52604-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis work was supported in part the the NSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme sponsored by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Project N PolyU564/25, and in part by the Research Institute for Climate-Resilient Infrastructure at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University under Grant NZH8Q.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.date.embargo0000-00-00 (to be updated)en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 0000-00-00 (to be updated)
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.