Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118076
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciences-
dc.creatorKu, HB-
dc.creatorYuen-Tsang, AWK-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-12T08:04:49Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-12T08:04:49Z-
dc.identifier.issn0261-5479-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118076-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rights© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in on 15 Oct 2024 (published online), available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2024.2415075.en_US
dc.subjectCapacity-buildingen_US
dc.subjectParticipatory action researchen_US
dc.subjectPractice and policy innovationen_US
dc.subjectSocial work in Chinaen_US
dc.subjectTransformative social work educationen_US
dc.titleTransformative social work education through a joint MSW programme : from participatory action research to policy and practice innovation in Chinaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage103-
dc.identifier.epage119-
dc.identifier.volume44-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02615479.2024.2415075-
dcterms.abstractIn China, social work was reestablished in 1988. Despite the number of social work programmes increased very fast throughout the 1990s, there was a huge need for social work-trained educators. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and Peking University launched the MSW (China) Programme in 2000 to create a critical mass of social work educators who would assume future leadership in social work development in mainland China. Participatory action research was employed as a methodology to explore how social work education could transform students into catalysts for social work education and social development. Purposive sampling was adopted, and seven cohorts totaling 238 graduates who graduated from the programme were the participants in this research. Data collection and analysis were carried out throughout the action research process. We found the triple capacity building model to be a good pedagogy to foster transformation among participants, and to steer the knowledge co-creation, practice innovation, policy reform, and social change through social work education. In this paper, we will provide an overview of the background, vision, and mission, as well as the teaching pedagogy of the programme and a case study to demonstrate how social work education has an impact on policy and practice innovation in China.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSocial work education, 2025, v. 44, no. 1, p. 103-119-
dcterms.isPartOfSocial work education-
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-86000383704-
dc.identifier.eissn1470-1227-
dc.description.validate202603 bcjz-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001211/2025-12en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe work was supported by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University [P00460005, 1-WZ45]; Keswick Foundation.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ku_Transformative_Social_Work.pdfPre-Published version564.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.