Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/118073
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese History and Cultureen_US
dc.creatorZou, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-12T01:43:28Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-12T01:43:28Z-
dc.identifier.issn0022-0094en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/118073-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Zou, D. (2025). Doctoring Revolution: The Paradox of Maoist Humanitarianism in Chinese Medical Aid to Algeria. Journal of Contemporary History, 0(0). Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). DOI: 10.1177/00220094251401603.en_US
dc.subjectAlgeriaen_US
dc.subjectChina–Africa relationsen_US
dc.subjectGlobal healthen_US
dc.subjectMaoismen_US
dc.subjectMedical aiden_US
dc.subjectRevolutionary humanitarianismen_US
dc.titleDoctoring revolution : the paradox of Maoist humanitarianism in Chinese medical aid to Algeriaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00220094251401603en_US
dcterms.abstractDuring the Cold War, humanitarian medicine became a field of global competition. Despite its diplomatic isolation, the People's Republic of China entered this arena in 1963 with medical missions to Africa. While officially framed as ‘technical cooperation’ to avoid the politically fraught term ‘humanitarianism’, Chinese doctors nonetheless invoked ‘revolutionary humanitarianism’ (geming rendao zhuyi) to interpret their work – a Maoist synthesis that rejected bourgeois humanism while embedding care within class struggle. While Western powers claimed neutral humanitarian principles and Soviet bloc nations delivered politically-aligned technical assistance, China pursued a more radical transformation: dissolving the boundary between medical expertise and revolutionary practice. This approach did not simply politicize medical work but sought to redefine medicine itself as revolutionary action. Drawing on state archives, media reports, and interviews, this article traces revolutionary humanitarianism from political discourse to its translation into medical practice in Algeria, showing how this reimagining shaped aid practice. The Algerian encounters reveal the fundamental paradox: it advanced China's diplomatic and ideological aims while producing tensions between revolutionary ideals, medical expertise, and local expectations. This China case presents an alternative moral grammar of medicine whose legacy still influences Beijing's global health rhetoric today.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of contemporary history, First published online December 9, 2025, OnlineFirst, https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094251401603en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of contemporary historyen_US
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105024424657-
dc.identifier.eissn1461-7250en_US
dc.description.validate202603 bcjzen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001179/2026-01-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zou_Doctoring_Revolution_Paradox.pdfPre-Published version365.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.