Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117957
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Biomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorGao, Gen_US
dc.creatorNg, SSMen_US
dc.creatorMan, SSen_US
dc.creatorSo, BCLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-09T06:08:15Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-09T06:08:15Z-
dc.identifier.issn0022-4375en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117957-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectErgonomic risk assessment methodsen_US
dc.subjectHealthcare workersen_US
dc.subjectWork-related musculoskeletal disordersen_US
dc.titleErgonomic risk assessment methods for work-related musculoskeletal disorders among healthcare workers : a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage189en_US
dc.identifier.epage196en_US
dc.identifier.volume95en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsr.2025.10.001en_US
dcterms.abstractIntroduction: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are prevalent among healthcare professionals due to the physically demanding nature of their work environments. These disorders increase costs associated with workers’ compensation claims and healthcare services, reduce productivity, and negatively impact the quality of life for affected workers. Therefore, proper ergonomic risk assessment tools are vital for monitoring and preventing WMSDs among healthcare professionals.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethod: This study provides a comprehensive overview of ergonomic risk assessment techniques used among healthcare workers. Following an extensive search, 31 studies published in English from 2014 to 2024 were identified.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: With growing awareness of ergonomic risks in healthcare settings, research has explored various assessment methods to understand and mitigate these risks among healthcare workers across different disciplines. This finding highlights the significant role of self-reported and observation-based methods, despite potential subjective biases. Despite their challenges and underutilization, direct measurement methods have demonstrated substantial potential for enhancing ergonomic assessments when appropriately adapted to healthcare environments.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions and practical applications: In future research, a longitudinal study design incorporating ergonomic risk assessment tools and hybrid methodologies integrating simulated settings with real-world observations should be employed to facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of ergonomic risks among healthcare professionals. This approach would contribute to the development of effective interventions aimed at mitigating WMSDs.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of safety research, Dec. 2025, v. 95, p. 189-196en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of safety researchen_US
dcterms.issued2025-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105018168200-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1247en_US
dc.description.validate202603 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001107/2026-02-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2028-12-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2028-12-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.