Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117729
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Biomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Sports Science and Technologyen_US
dc.contributorMainland Development Officeen_US
dc.creatorZhao, Xen_US
dc.creatorJin, Yen_US
dc.creatorWang, AYen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-04T05:59:38Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-04T05:59:38Z-
dc.identifier.issn0306-4573en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117729-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectJournaling systemen_US
dc.subjectLarge language modelsen_US
dc.subjectPersonal informaticsen_US
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_US
dc.subjectPost-exercise reflectionen_US
dc.titleFrom tracking to thinking : facilitating post-exercise reflection by a large language model-mediated journaling systemen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume63en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104574en_US
dcterms.abstractWearable devices provide rich quantitative data for self-reflection on physical activity. However, users often struggle to derive meaningful insights from these data, highlighting the need for enhanced support. To investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can facilitate this process, we propose and evaluate a human-LLM collaborative reflective journaling paradigm. We developed PaceMind, an LLM-mediated journaling system that implements this paradigm based on a three-stage reflection framework. It can generate data-driven drafts and personalized questions to guide users in integrating exercise data with personal insights. A two-week within-subjects study ((Formula presented) ) compared the LLM-mediated system with a template-based journaling baseline. The LLM-mediated design significantly improved the perceived effectiveness of reflection support and increased users’ intention to use the system. However, perceived ease of use did not improve significantly. Users appreciated the LLM’s scaffolding for easing data sense-making, but also reported added cognitive work in verifying and personalizing the LLM-generated content. Although objective activity levels did not change significantly, the LLM-mediated condition showed a trend toward more adaptive exercise planning and sustained engagement. Our findings provide empirical evidence for a human-LLM collaborative reflection paradigm in a data-intensive exercise context. They highlight both the potential to deepen user reflection and underscore the critical design challenge of balancing automation with meaningful cognitive engagement and user control.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInformation processing and management, June 2026, v. 63, no. 4, 104574en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInformation processing and managementen_US
dcterms.issued2026-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105027541778-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5371en_US
dc.identifier.artn104574en_US
dc.description.validate202603 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001060/2026-02-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis study was sponsored by the Research Grants Council (RGC #15211322), Shenzhen Research Fund (JCYJ20230807140414029), and the Research Institute for Sports Science and Technology (RISports) in the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2028-06-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2028-06-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.