Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117706
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorWang, Cen_US
dc.creatorXu, Jen_US
dc.creatorZhai, Hen_US
dc.creatorSo, LKen_US
dc.creatorGuo, Hen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-03T07:46:12Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-03T07:46:12Z-
dc.identifier.issn0304-3894en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117706-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectAirborne transmissionen_US
dc.subjectComputational fluid dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectPIVen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory diseaseen_US
dc.titleEnhanced aerosol dispersion of a sequential cough and social distancing implicationsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume498en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.140002en_US
dcterms.abstractSequential coughs, although common, have received less attention in airborne transmission studies compared to single coughs. In this study, we explored aerosol dispersion from sequential coughs using large eddy simulation (LES), validated by particle image velocimetry (PIV) experiments. Two types of sequential coughs were investigated and compared to a single cough: one with two identical peak velocities of 10 m/s (10–10 m/s), and another with peak velocities of 10 m/s followed by 5 m/s (10–5 m/s). In the 10–10 m/s scenario, the second cough merged with the first at 2 s and 1.2 m, resulting in enhanced aerosol dispersion compared to a single cough. In contrast, in the 10–5 m/s scenario, the second cough, due to its lower velocity, caught up with the first at 8 s and 1.6 m. The 10–10 m/s scenario demonstrated a stronger capacity for dispersing aerosols than both the 10–5 m/s scenario and the single cough. Sequential coughs increased infection risk by 2–4 times across the full range and required an average increase of 0.5 m in social distancing, due to the enhanced aerosol dispersion and emission of aerosols. These findings improve our understanding of aerosol transmission and inform social distancing guidelines in indoor environments.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of hazardous materials, 15 Oct. 2025, v. 498, 140002en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of hazardous materialsen_US
dcterms.issued2025-10-15-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105017424025-
dc.identifier.pmid41032929-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-3336en_US
dc.identifier.artn140002en_US
dc.description.validate202603 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG001053/2026-02-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis work was supported by the Collaborative Research Fund (CRF) Scheme (C5024\u201321G) from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and the RAP Start-up Fund under the Strategic Hiring Scheme (A0043523) from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-10-15en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-10-15
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of May 8, 2026

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Apr 23, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.