Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117653
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communication-
dc.creatorDing, L-
dc.creatorZou, D-
dc.creatorKohnke, L-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-26T03:47:48Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-26T03:47:48Z-
dc.identifier.issn1360-2357-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117653-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLCen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2025en_US
dc.rightsOpen Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publicaiton Ding, L., Zou, D. & Kohnke, L. ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool: how students perceive it and how it affects their writing. Educ Inf Technol 30, 26777–26799 (2025) is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13775-3.en_US
dc.subjectAutomated writing evaluationen_US
dc.subjectChatGPTen_US
dc.subjectStudent perceptionsen_US
dc.subjectWriting performanceen_US
dc.titleChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool : how students perceive it and how it affects their writingen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage26777-
dc.identifier.epage26799-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue18-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10639-025-13775-3-
dcterms.abstractGenerative artificial intelligence (GAI) language models, exemplified by ChatGPT, are significantly helping language learners in writing practice by providing immediate formative feedback. This study investigates whether ChatGPT’s writing feedback influences graduate students’ academic writing abilities and compares it with combined instructor and ChatGPT feedback. The students receiving only ChatGPT feedback (Group A) showed significant improvements in mechanics, tone, grammar, APA formatting, and overall writing quality, with lesser gains in organisation and no significant change in content. In contrast, the students who received combined feedback (Group B) exhibited significant enhancements in all of the parameters that were evaluated, including the areas in which Group A lagged. However, the only significant between-group difference was in grammar, although there was a marginal difference in organisation that suggested a trend towards greater improvement in Group B. The participants expressed positive attitudes about using ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool, especially for correcting grammar and enriching vocabulary.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEducation and information technologies, Dec. 2025, v. 30, no. 18, p. 26777-26799-
dcterms.isPartOfEducation and information technologies-
dcterms.issued2025-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105018754880-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7608-
dc.description.validate202602 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe work described in this paper was partially supported by the Start-up Fund for New Recruits of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project No. P0056518). Additionally, support was received from the TDG at the Education University of Hong Kong (Project No. T0293).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s10639-025-13775-3.pdf1.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.