Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117620
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorZhang, Y-
dc.creatorLiu, S-
dc.creatorYu, P-
dc.creatorLiu, H-
dc.creatorKong, F-
dc.creatorJin, G-
dc.creatorChen, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-26T03:47:29Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-26T03:47:29Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117620-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Yu, P., Liu, H., Kong, F., Jin, G., & Chen, Y. (2025). Non-Linear Impacts of Social and Ecological Drivers on Ecosystem Services: A Threshold Perspective. Urban Science, 9(10), 390 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9100390.en_US
dc.subjectEcosystem servicesen_US
dc.subjectPartial dependency analysisen_US
dc.subjectRandom foresten_US
dc.subjectSocio-ecological driversen_US
dc.subjectThresholden_US
dc.titleNon-linear impacts of social and ecological drivers on ecosystem services : a threshold perspectiveen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/urbansci9100390-
dcterms.abstractExploring the impact of socio-ecological drivers on ecosystem services (ESs) is critical to ES conservation and restoration. Although a considerable amount of the literature has focused on this topic, few studies have investigated the non-linear impact thresholds of socio-ecological drivers on ESs from a global perspective. In this study, multisource geospatial data was integrated with ecological modeling to quantify six typical ESs in Wuhan, China. Dominant drivers were identified through random forests, and non-linear relationships and thresholds were analyzed by partial dependence analysis. The results revealed that elevator, distance from rivers, soil organic carbon content, aggregation index, and Shannon diversity index were the dominant drivers of most ESs. Moreover, three types of non-linear impact thresholds exist in the relationship between ESs and their socio-ecological drivers: “single threshold” effects; “monotonic impact” effects; and “complex curve” effects, including “S-shape”, “inverted U-shape” and “inverted S-shape” effects. Based on these findings, we proposed policy guidance to inform ecological protection and restoration aimed at enhancing ES provision and promoting sustainable development.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationUrban science, Oct. 2025, v. 9, no. 10, 390-
dcterms.isPartOfUrban science-
dcterms.issued2025-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105020068817-
dc.identifier.eissn2413-8851-
dc.identifier.artn390-
dc.description.validate202602 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42101284 and No.71974070).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
urbansci-09-00390.pdf3.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.