Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117610
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Fashion and Textiles-
dc.contributorSchool of Professional Education and Executive Development-
dc.creatorChan, MK-
dc.creatorHung, SC-
dc.creatorYick, KL-
dc.creatorSun, Y-
dc.creatorYip, J-
dc.creatorNg, SP-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-26T03:47:24Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-26T03:47:24Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117610-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Chan, M.-k., Hung, S.-c., Yick, K.-l., Sun, Y., Yip, J., & Ng, S.-p. (2025). Impact Absorption Behaviour of 3D-Printed Lattice Structures for Sportswear Applications. Polymers, 17(19), 2611 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17192611.en_US
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturingen_US
dc.subjectEnergy absorptionen_US
dc.subjectForce reductionen_US
dc.subjectLattice structuresen_US
dc.subjectRe-entranten_US
dc.subjectRhombic dodecahedronen_US
dc.subjectSports protective equipmenten_US
dc.titleImpact absorption behaviour of 3D-printed lattice structures for sportswear applicationsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume17-
dc.identifier.issue19-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/polym17192611-
dcterms.abstractLattice structures have been widely studied in various fields due to their lightweight and high-energy absorption capabilities. In this study, we propose the use of lattice structures in the design of sports protective equipment for contact sports athletes. A total of six specimens were additively manufactured either with a bending-dominated rhombic dodecahedron (RD) structure or stretch-dominated re-entrant (RE) structure. Elastic resin was used to investigate the specimens’ compressive strength and energy absorption, impact reduction, and flexural properties in comparison with those of conventional foam and rigid polyethylene (PU). Despite having a lower relative density, the RE structure exhibits greater stiffness, showing up to 40% greater hardness and averaging 30.5% higher bending rigidity compared with the RD structure. However, it unexpectedly shows less stability and strength under uniaxial loading, which is 3 to 6 times weaker when compared with the non-auxetic RD structure. Although conventional PU has higher loading than 3D-printed lattices, the lattice shows excellent bendability, which is only 1.5 to 3 times stiffer than that of foam. The 3D-printed lattice in this study shows an optimal improvement of 43% in terms of impact absorption compared with foam and a 2.3% improvement compared with PU. Amongst the six different unit cell dimensions and structures studied, the RD lattice with a cell size of 5 mm is the most promising candidate; it has superior elasticity, compressive strength, and impact resistance performance whether it is under low- or high-impact conditions. The findings of this study provide a basis for the development of 3D-printed lattice sports protective chest equipment, which is more comfortable and offers improved protection for contact sports players.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPolymers, Oct. 2025, v. 17, no. 19, 2611-
dcterms.isPartOfPolymers-
dcterms.issued2025-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105018804556-
dc.identifier.eissn2073-4360-
dc.identifier.artn2611-
dc.description.validate202602 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis research was funded by the Research Grant Council (project account PolyU 15606922) and the C.C. Lee Scholarship.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
polymers-17-02611.pdf2.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.