Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117515
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineering-
dc.creatorWang, Jen_US
dc.creatorDemartino, Cen_US
dc.creatorSberna, APen_US
dc.creatorJiang, Len_US
dc.creatorUsmani, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-26T03:46:29Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-26T03:46:29Z-
dc.identifier.issn0263-8223en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117515-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wang, J., Demartino, C., Sberna, A. P., Jiang, L., & Usmani, A. (2025). Enhanced compressive performance and energy absorption in SLM-fabricated 316L arrowhead auxetics via tendon and stuffer geometry modification. Composite Structures, 374, 119710 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119710.en_US
dc.subjectArrowhead structuresen_US
dc.subjectAuxetic metamaterialsen_US
dc.subjectCompressive behavioren_US
dc.subjectFinite Element Modeling (FEM)en_US
dc.subjectProtective applicationsen_US
dc.subjectSelective Laser Melting (SLM)en_US
dc.subjectSHPBen_US
dc.titleEnhanced compressive performance and energy absorption in SLM-fabricated 316L arrowhead auxetics via tendon and stuffer geometry modificationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume374en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119710en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study systematically investigates how tailoring the geometry of double-arrowhead auxetic lattice structures — specifically by reducing tendon dimensions while enlarging stuffers — impacts their compressive behavior and energy absorption capabilities. Specimens were fabricated from 316L stainless steel using Selective Laser Melting (SLM) at target relative densities of 5%, 10%, and 15%. We compare the performance of a baseline configuration with equal-sized tendons and stuffers (Lat1 N) against a modified configuration featuring smaller tendons and larger stuffers (Lat1 S). The mechanical response was characterized through a combination of experimental testing, including quasi-static and dynamic (Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar, SHPB) compression, and validated Finite Element Modeling (FEM) analyses, focusing on deformation mechanisms, energy absorption efficiency, Poisson's ratio evolution, and failure modes. Results confirm that increasing relative density significantly enhances the mechanical properties of both auxetic lattice designs. Critically, the geometrically modified Lat1 S configuration consistently demonstrated superior mechanical performance over the baseline Lat1 N, particularly at higher relative densities. For instance, at 15% relative density, Lat1 S exhibited a quasi-static plateau stress of 42MPa (21% higher than Lat1 N's 35MPa) and a dynamic plateau stress of 48MPa under P=0.25MPa impact (24% higher than Lat1 N's 38.5MPa). Correspondingly, the yield stresses for Lat1 S were 42.49MPa (quasi-static) and 48.98MPa (dynamic at P=0.25MPa), exceeding the respective Lat1 N values (36.5MPa and 41.24MPa). Furthermore, the enhanced design (Lat1 S) achieved superior energy management, reaching an energy absorption per volume (W) of 10.67MJ/m3 and a specific energy absorption (SEA) up to 32J/g, approximately 20% greater than Lat1 N at higher densities. Both configurations exhibited significant strain rate sensitivity, with the dynamic increase factor (DIF) ranging from 1.15 to 1.85 across the tested rates. The improved compressive resistance and energy absorption in Lat1 S are attributed to the enhanced load distribution facilitated by the larger stuffers, highlighting a promising strategy for optimizing auxetic metamaterials for protective applications.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationComposite structures, 15 Dec. 2025, v. 374, 119710en_US
dcterms.isPartOfComposite structuresen_US
dcterms.issued2025-12-15-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105018940966-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1085en_US
dc.identifier.artn119710en_US
dc.description.validate202602 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOS-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe research reported in this article was supported by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Department of Building Environment and Energy Engineering. This work was partially supported by the Zhejiang University/the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Institute . The authors acknowledge Bangwei LIU (research assistant of ZJUI), Yating SUN (undergraduate student of ZJUI), and Haoran YE (undergraduate student of ZJUI) for helping in the DIC recording and analysis presented in this study.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S026382232500875X-main.pdf20.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.