Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117417
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorPan, Len_US
dc.creatorHui, ECMen_US
dc.creatorShen, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-24T01:52:14Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-24T01:52:14Z-
dc.identifier.issn0305-750Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117417-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectInfrastructure investmenten_US
dc.subjectLeft-wingen_US
dc.subjectLegal institutionsen_US
dc.subjectMarket governance institutionsen_US
dc.subjectPopulisten_US
dc.subjectRight-wingen_US
dc.titlePopulism and global infrastructure investmenten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume200en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107282en_US
dcterms.abstractPopulism has surged globally amid increasing globalization and political polarization. This study examines the divergent effects of left-wing and right-wing populist governments on infrastructure investment. Using panel data from 59 countries between 1990 and 2019, we find that left-wing populist governments significantly reduce infrastructure investment, while right-wing populist governments do not exhibit a similar impact. Mechanism analysis reveals that left-wing populist governments impair infrastructure investment by weakening legal institutions and deteriorating market governance institutions, whereas right-wing populist governments do not have such effects. Furthermore, the negative effects of left populism are particularly pronounced in three types of countries: those with multi-chamber parliamentary systems, those classified as low-income economies, and those with higher debt-to-GDP ratios. This research enriches the understanding of the economic consequences of populism and the lasting impacts of populist policies on infrastructure development, and contributes to the ongoing debate on the complex relationship between populism and economic outcomes.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWorld development, Apr. 2026, v. 200, 107282en_US
dcterms.isPartOfWorld developmenten_US
dcterms.issued2026-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105023876791-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5991en_US
dc.identifier.artn107282en_US
dc.description.validate202602 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000984/2026-01-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis work was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council, General Research Fund (grant number: 12504122) and the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (grant number: P0044453). The research team appreciates the insightful comments from Prof. Jean-Paul Faguet (Associate Editor) and the five anonymous reviewers.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2028-04-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2028-04-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.