Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117397
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorMa, Zen_US
dc.creatorWang, Zen_US
dc.creatorPeng, Yen_US
dc.creatorXu, Yen_US
dc.creatorChen, Aen_US
dc.creatorYang, Xen_US
dc.creatorWu, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-23T02:57:56Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-23T02:57:56Z-
dc.identifier.issn2213-624Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117397-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.subjectPercolationen_US
dc.subjectResilience assessmenten_US
dc.subjectSpatial equityen_US
dc.subjectUrban air mobilityen_US
dc.titleEquity analysis of urban transportation network resilience with urban air mobility integrationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101673en_US
dcterms.abstractFaced with chronic traffic congestion and spatial inequities, global megacities urgently need urban air mobility (UAM) integration to enhance transportation resilience and promote equitable mobility. This study constructs a constrained clustering model to identify vertiport locations, considering no-fly zones and integrating passenger flow demand and point of interest (POI) distribution. By constructing a two-layer transport network and employing percolation theory, we systematically evaluate how vertiport deployment strategies impact regional-level resilience and equity. The findings of the Beijing case reveal the relationship between deployment scale and resilience equity. Moderate deployment helps to improve and compensate for regional resilience differences, balance efficiency and fairness, but large-scale deployment exacerbates inequality. This research underscores the importance of strategic and non-uniform vertiport siting to mitigate urban transport disparities, providing theoretical insights and policy recommendations for equitable UAM development.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCase studies on transport policy, Mar. 2026, v. 23, 101673en_US
dcterms.isPartOfCase studies on transport policyen_US
dcterms.issued2026-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105023647818-
dc.identifier.eissn2213-6258en_US
dc.identifier.artn101673en_US
dc.description.validate202602 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000954/2026-01-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis research was jointly supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (PolyU 15222221), the Research Institute for Climate-Resilient Infrastructure (N-ZH8Q) at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Nos. L241036). Their support is gratefully acknowledged.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2028-03-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2028-03-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.