Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117331
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorHou, Hen_US
dc.creatorYau, Yen_US
dc.creatorLaw, KKen_US
dc.creatorLin, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-12T01:10:11Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-12T01:10:11Z-
dc.identifier.issn0378-7788en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117331-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectEnergy-saving behaviouren_US
dc.subjectIncentive responsivenessen_US
dc.subjectOccupant energy consumptionen_US
dc.subjectPublic housingen_US
dc.subjectWillingness-to-accept (WTA)en_US
dc.titleIncentive-responsive energy use in low-income housing : evidence from Hong Kong public rental estatesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume351en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116728en_US
dcterms.abstractElectricity and water conservation in high-density public housing remains challenging due to heterogeneous household conditions and daily routines that limit the effectiveness of uniform incentives. This study examines how 351 Hong Kong public rental households respond to monthly financial rewards for two targeted behaviours: reducing air-conditioning (AC) use and shortening shower duration. Using multinomial logit models and a path analysis, the study links economic drivers (household income and utility bills) and behavioural routines related to AC temperature set-point, shower duration and bathroom appliance usage to incentive responsiveness. Results show that higher-income households are 3.2 times more likely to accept medium rather than high incentives for AC usage reduction, while winter appliance (e.g. bathroom heater) use increases responsiveness (OR = 3.1, p < 0.01) to shower-time reduction incentives. Baseline usage patterns were not significant predictors, indicating that financial and contextual factors outweigh habitual routines. The path model (CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.05) confirms that economic conditions primarily shape responsiveness in cooling behaviour, whereas behavioural routines dominate water-use adjustments. By positioning incentive responsiveness as a mediator between household conditions and conservation intentions, this study enhances understanding of behavioural economics in demand-side management and offers a framework for targeted, cost-effective policies in low-income, high-density urban housing.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEnergy and buildings, 15 Jan. 2026, v. 351, 116728en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEnergy and buildingsen_US
dcterms.issued2026-01-15-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105022841006-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6178en_US
dc.identifier.artn116728en_US
dc.description.validate202602 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4327-
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000910/2026-01, 52592-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2028-01-15en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2028-01-15
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.