Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117194
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorWang, XLen_US
dc.creatorPeng, Sen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T05:49:09Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-06T05:49:09Z-
dc.identifier.issn0377-2217en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117194-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectAfter-sales serviceen_US
dc.subjectMarket-share redistributionen_US
dc.subjectMultinomial logiten_US
dc.subjectPricingen_US
dc.subjectSimultaneous/sequential gameen_US
dc.titleExtended warranty pricing in a competitive aftermarket under logit demanden_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage541en_US
dc.identifier.epage552en_US
dc.identifier.volume325en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.001en_US
dcterms.abstractIt is common for multiple firms—such as manufacturers, retailers, and third-party insurers—to coexist and compete in the aftermarket for durable products. In this paper, we study price competition in a partially concentrated aftermarket where one firm offers multiple extended warranty (EW) contracts while the others offer a single one. The demand for EWs is described by the multinomial logit model. We show that, at equilibrium, such an aftermarket behaves like a combination of monopoly and oligopoly. Building upon this base model, we further investigate sequential pricing games for a durable product and its EWs to accommodate the ancillary nature of after-sales services. We consider two scenarios: one where the manufacturer (as the market leader) sets product and EW prices simultaneously, and another where these decisions are made sequentially. Our analysis demonstrates that offering EWs incentivizes the manufacturer to lower the product price, thereby expanding the market potential for EWs. Simultaneous product–EW pricing leads to a price concession on EWs compared to sequential pricing, effectively reducing the intensity of competition in the aftermarket. Overall, the competitiveness of an EW hinges on its ability to deliver high value to consumers at low marginal cost to its provider. While our focus is on EWs, the proposed game-theoretical pricing models apply broadly to other ancillary after-sales services.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEuropean journal of operational research, 16 Sept 2025, v. 325, no. 3, p. 541-552en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEuropean journal of operational researchen_US
dcterms.issued2025-09-16-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002681435-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6860en_US
dc.description.validate202602 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000823/2025-11-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 72201180 ), the Research Committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (grant number G-UARJ ), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (grant number 2024JJ6070 ). The authors are grateful to the editor and four anonymous referees for their constructive comments that helped improve the quality and presentation of this paper significantly.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-09-16en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-09-16
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.