Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117101
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Sustainable Urban Developmenten_US
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Smart Energyen_US
dc.creatorLi, Zen_US
dc.creatorZheng, Nen_US
dc.creatorChen, Xen_US
dc.creatorZhou, Zen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Yen_US
dc.creatorZeng, Men_US
dc.creatorNi, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T00:52:12Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-03T00:52:12Z-
dc.identifier.issn0360-3199en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117101-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectCathode thicknessen_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessment (LCA)en_US
dc.subjectManufacturing cost assessment (MCA)en_US
dc.subjectProtonic ceramic electrolysis cell (PCEC)en_US
dc.titleLife cycle environmental and cost assessment of the protonic ceramic electrolysis stack manufacturingen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage633en_US
dc.identifier.epage643en_US
dc.identifier.volume145en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.06.086en_US
dcterms.abstractProtonic ceramic electrolysis cell (PCEC) is one of the potential electrolysis technologies for realizing green hydrogen production. However, the environmental footprint and expenditures related to the manufacturing of PCEC is still unclear. This study presents an integrated study of PCEC stack manufacturing by performing both life cycle assessment (LCA) and manufacturing cost assessment (MCA). The cathode is identified as the most environment-detrimental ceramic component, 22.6 % higher than the anode. The frame is the most influential metallic component in PCEC stack, accounting for 43.5 % of CO<inf>2</inf> emissions. Reducing the utilization of metallic material in PCEC manufacturing is underlined as they accounts for over 80 % of material costs. Importantly, decreasing cathode thickness is highlighted as an effective strategy to lower both environmental impacts and manufacturing costs simultaneously. This work provides a comprehensive assessment of PCEC stack production in terms of environmental influences and economic attainability, offering several useful strategies for PCEC stack improvement.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of hydrogen energy, 7 July 2025, v. 145, p. 633-643en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of hydrogen energyen_US
dcterms.issued2025-07-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105007599450-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-3487en_US
dc.description.validate202602 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4318-
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000805/2025-11, 52583-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingTextFunding text 1: M. NI thanks the grant (Project Number: SRFS2324-5S02 ) from Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee, Hong Kong SAR.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-07-07en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-07-07
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.