Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117088
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorLin, Xen_US
dc.creatorHui, ECMen_US
dc.creatorCong, Zen_US
dc.creatorShen, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-02T08:06:18Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-02T08:06:18Z-
dc.identifier.issn0304-3878en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117088-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCollective coordinationen_US
dc.subjectLand reformen_US
dc.subjectProperty rightsen_US
dc.subjectRural developmenten_US
dc.subjectRural entrepreneurshipen_US
dc.titleSolving coordination failures : collective land transfer rights and rural entrepreneurshipen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume178en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103609en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study explores whether strengthening communal land rights can address coordination failures caused by fragmented land tenure. Based on China's ambitious land reform that permits rural collectives to directly sell or rent their construction land to enterprises, we discover that collective land transfer rights boost rural entrepreneurship by 25%. This positive firm growth is entirely concentrated in regions where collective coordination is simpler to achieve (i.e., less rugged areas and regions with denser clan networks). We identify two specific pathways behind the entrepreneurial growth: lower land use costs for firms and increased land wealth for local residents. The reform also facilitates expansion into non-farm wage employment, mainly due to more active participation in the labor market rather than via a decline in the agricultural sector. Our findings emphasize the importance of communal rights and collective negotiation in reducing coordination costs and offer new insights into promoting rural development in developing countries.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of development economics, Jan. 2026, v. 178, 103609en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of development economicsen_US
dcterms.issued2026-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105012879136-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6089en_US
dc.identifier.artn103609en_US
dc.description.validate202602 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000803/2025-11-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis study was supported by research grants from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Grant Nos. P0044453 and P0044347 ). The research team appreciates the constructive comments from Prof. Andrew Foster (Editor-in-Chief) and three anonymous reviewers.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2029-01-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2029-01-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.