Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117088
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Building and Real Estate | en_US |
| dc.creator | Lin, X | en_US |
| dc.creator | Hui, ECM | en_US |
| dc.creator | Cong, Z | en_US |
| dc.creator | Shen, J | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-02T08:06:18Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-02T08:06:18Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0304-3878 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117088 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
| dc.subject | Collective coordination | en_US |
| dc.subject | Land reform | en_US |
| dc.subject | Property rights | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rural development | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rural entrepreneurship | en_US |
| dc.title | Solving coordination failures : collective land transfer rights and rural entrepreneurship | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 178 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103609 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | This study explores whether strengthening communal land rights can address coordination failures caused by fragmented land tenure. Based on China's ambitious land reform that permits rural collectives to directly sell or rent their construction land to enterprises, we discover that collective land transfer rights boost rural entrepreneurship by 25%. This positive firm growth is entirely concentrated in regions where collective coordination is simpler to achieve (i.e., less rugged areas and regions with denser clan networks). We identify two specific pathways behind the entrepreneurial growth: lower land use costs for firms and increased land wealth for local residents. The reform also facilitates expansion into non-farm wage employment, mainly due to more active participation in the labor market rather than via a decline in the agricultural sector. Our findings emphasize the importance of communal rights and collective negotiation in reducing coordination costs and offer new insights into promoting rural development in developing countries. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | embargoed access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Journal of development economics, Jan. 2026, v. 178, 103609 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Journal of development economics | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2026-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105012879136 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1872-6089 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.artn | 103609 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202602 bchy | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Not applicable | en_US |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | G000803/2025-11 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | This study was supported by research grants from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Grant Nos. P0044453 and P0044347 ). The research team appreciates the constructive comments from Prof. Andrew Foster (Editor-in-Chief) and three anonymous reviewers. | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.date.embargo | 2029-01-31 | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



