Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117029
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorKang, Zen_US
dc.creatorYe, Zen_US
dc.creatorHsu, SCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-26T08:42:12Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-26T08:42:12Z-
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117029-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectCarbon footprinten_US
dc.subjectCoordinated chargingen_US
dc.subjectDemand uncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectDistribution griden_US
dc.subjectElectric vehicleen_US
dc.titleMinimizing carbon footprint from power generation for electric vehicle charging considering demand uncertainty and grid operation constraintsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume335en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.energy.2025.138184en_US
dcterms.abstractMatching electric vehicle (EV) charging with low-carbon electricity generation through charging power optimization is critical to enhancing the environmental benefits of vehicle electrification. However, existing strategies often overlook the balance with distribution grid constraints and rely on offline optimization, which requires complete daily EV charging demand data in advance. This study develops an online optimization framework integrating load flow analysis and the rolling horizon approach. Load flow analysis first determines an electrical load limit based on distribution grid constraints, including bus voltage deviation, transformer loading, and power flow transmission limits. Subsequently, the rolling horizon approach dynamically optimizes EV charging powers to align with periods of low-carbon electricity generation, accommodating future uncertain charging demand. Simulations based on real-world data from a workplace parking lot in California, USA, demonstrated that the framework could reduce daily CO<inf>2</inf> emissions by up to 20 % compared to uncontrolled charging, showing a non-linear relationship between charging demand and emission mitigation. Statistical analysis revealed that the online optimization approach closely matched the performance of offline optimization. The emission reduction gap was less than 3.3 %, with no statistically significant differences observed in most scenarios. These results verified the efficacy of the framework under diverse operational conditions.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEnergy, 30 Oct. 2025, v. 335, 138184en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEnergyen_US
dcterms.issued2025-10-30-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105014529333-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6785en_US
dc.identifier.artn138184en_US
dc.description.validate202601 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000779/2025-10, a4291-
dc.identifier.SubFormID52545-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe authors gratefully acknowledged the support of the research postgraduate scholarship from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University . They also appreciated the constructive comments from four anonymous reviewers and the thought-provoking discussions with Hui Wang and Yangze Lan during the 105th TRB Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C., which significantly improved the quality of this article.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-10-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-10-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.