Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/117026
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorHou, Yen_US
dc.creatorYou, Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-26T07:14:21Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-26T07:14:21Z-
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/117026-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectAirborne disease transmissionen_US
dc.subjectComputational fluid dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectConcurrent gasper operationen_US
dc.subjectExposure indexen_US
dc.subjectPractical gasper operation strategyen_US
dc.titleA practical concurrent gasper-operation strategy for controlling airborne disease transmission in an economy-class aircraft cabin with personalized displacement ventilationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume285en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113636en_US
dcterms.abstractAirborne disease transmission in aircraft cabins is closely influenced by airflow patterns. Gaspers, commonly used by passengers, play a critical role in shaping the local airflow. Our previous study investigated the working mechanism of an individual gasper and found that adjusting a receptor's gasper appropriately could effectively protect the receptor. However, in practice, multiple gaspers are operated simultaneously by passengers, and their interaction with the main airflow significantly complicates the contaminant transport in the cabin. Therefore, this study aims to identify an executable gasper operation strategy for passengers to control the transmission of airborne diseases. We first proposed a seat-type-dependent gasper operation strategy based on the working mechanism of a single gasper from our previous study. Random gasper operation under realistic conditions was innovatively used as the benchmark. The two operation strategies were then applied in a seven-row section of a single-aisle, fully occupied, economy-class aircraft cabin with a personalized displacement ventilation system for numerical simulations. The results showed that when the source passenger was in the window seat or middle seat, the proposed operation strategy with full utilization reduced the mean exposure index by at least 25.4 % for most passengers, except those seated directly in front of the source passenger. When the source passenger was in the aisle seat, there was no significant difference between the proposed strategy and random operation in controlling the transmission. These findings provide practical guidance for gasper operation in aircraft cabins to mitigate airborne transmission risks.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBuilding and environment, 1 Nov. 2025, v. 285, pt. B, 113636en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBuilding and environmenten_US
dcterms.issued2025-11-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105014933363-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-684Xen_US
dc.identifier.artn113636en_US
dc.description.validate202601 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000775/2025-10-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis work was supported by the Early Career Scheme (Grant No. 25210419) and the General Research Fund (Grant No. 15202221) of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong SAR, China.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-11-01en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-11-01
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.