Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116958
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorKee, T-
dc.creatorHo, WKO-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T03:54:19Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-21T03:54:19Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116958-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Kee, T., & Ho, W. K. O. (2025). Optimizing Machine Learning Models for Urban Sciences: A Comparative Analysis of Hyperparameter Tuning Methods. Urban Science, 9(9), 348 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9090348.en_US
dc.subjectGrid searchen_US
dc.subjectHyperparameter tuningen_US
dc.subjectOptunaen_US
dc.subjectRandom searchen_US
dc.titleOptimizing machine learning models for urban sciences : a comparative analysis of hyperparameter tuning methodsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/urbansci9090348-
dcterms.abstractAdvancing urban scholarship and addressing pressing challenges such as gentrification, housing affordability, and urban sprawl require robust predictive models. In urban sciences, the performance of these models depends heavily on hyperparameter tuning, yet systematic evaluations of tuning approaches remain limited. This study compares two traditional hyperparameter tuning methods, Random Search and Grid Search, with Optuna, a more recent and advanced optimization framework, using housing transaction data as an illustrative case. Our findings show that Optuna substantially outperforms the other methods, running 6.77 to 108.92 times faster while consistently achieving lower error values across multiple evaluation metrics. By demonstrating both efficiency and accuracy gains, this research underscores the potential of advanced tuning strategies to accelerate urban analytics and provide more reliable evidence for policy-making.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationUrban science, Sept 2025, v. 9, no. 9, 348-
dcterms.isPartOfUrban science-
dcterms.issued2025-09-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105017094135-
dc.identifier.eissn2413-8851-
dc.identifier.artn348-
dc.description.validate202601 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis study was supported by funding from the Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project ID: P0049970, Department Incentive Fund).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
urbansci-09-00348-v2.pdf2.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
Citations as of Apr 3, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.