Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116958
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Building and Real Estate | - |
| dc.creator | Kee, T | - |
| dc.creator | Ho, WKO | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-21T03:54:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-21T03:54:19Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116958 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | MDPI AG | en_US |
| dc.rights | Copyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Kee, T., & Ho, W. K. O. (2025). Optimizing Machine Learning Models for Urban Sciences: A Comparative Analysis of Hyperparameter Tuning Methods. Urban Science, 9(9), 348 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9090348. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Grid search | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hyperparameter tuning | en_US |
| dc.subject | Optuna | en_US |
| dc.subject | Random search | en_US |
| dc.title | Optimizing machine learning models for urban sciences : a comparative analysis of hyperparameter tuning methods | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 9 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 9 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/urbansci9090348 | - |
| dcterms.abstract | Advancing urban scholarship and addressing pressing challenges such as gentrification, housing affordability, and urban sprawl require robust predictive models. In urban sciences, the performance of these models depends heavily on hyperparameter tuning, yet systematic evaluations of tuning approaches remain limited. This study compares two traditional hyperparameter tuning methods, Random Search and Grid Search, with Optuna, a more recent and advanced optimization framework, using housing transaction data as an illustrative case. Our findings show that Optuna substantially outperforms the other methods, running 6.77 to 108.92 times faster while consistently achieving lower error values across multiple evaluation metrics. By demonstrating both efficiency and accuracy gains, this research underscores the potential of advanced tuning strategies to accelerate urban analytics and provide more reliable evidence for policy-making. | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Urban science, Sept 2025, v. 9, no. 9, 348 | - |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Urban science | - |
| dcterms.issued | 2025-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105017094135 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2413-8851 | - |
| dc.identifier.artn | 348 | - |
| dc.description.validate | 202601 bcch | - |
| dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_Scopus/WOS | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | This study was supported by funding from the Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project ID: P0049970, Department Incentive Fund). | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | CC | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| urbansci-09-00348-v2.pdf | 2.84 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



