Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116635
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Advanced Manufacturingen_US
dc.contributorResearch Centre for Digital Transformation of Tourismen_US
dc.creatorWu, Wen_US
dc.creatorLi, Men_US
dc.creatorHuang, GQen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-08T03:48:11Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-08T03:48:11Z-
dc.identifier.issn0956-053Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116635-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectElectric automobile batteryen_US
dc.subjectGovernment policyen_US
dc.subjectSystem dynamicsen_US
dc.titleComparisons of government policies for electric automobile battery recycling using system dynamicsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume203en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114892en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper established an electric automobile closed-loop chain and obtained optimal pricing and carbon reduction strategies. Then, the system dynamics (SD) method was adopted to define the electric automobile battery closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) boundary. By constructing the stock flow diagram, the linkages between the government module, the positive supply chain module, and the backward recycling module in the CLSC system were visualized, and how emission trading and recycling policies affect decision-making was explained. Furthermore, the full-chain revenue, recovery rate, government revenue, and outlays of eight policy options were simulated. The results indicated that a policy mix was significantly better than a single policy from the perspective of full-chain revenue and the recovery rate. Combining an allowance policy and a deposit–return system could result in greater revenue for the government. Recycling technology advancement and growth in green consumption tendencies enhance the performance of recycling policies.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWaste management, 15 July 2025, v. 203, 114892en_US
dcterms.isPartOfWaste managementen_US
dcterms.issued2025-07-15-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105005254041-
dc.identifier.pmid40393275-
dc.identifier.artn114892en_US
dc.description.validate202601 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000660/2025-11-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis paper is partially supported by two grants from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. PolyU15208824 and T32-707/22-N).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-07-15en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-07-15
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Citations as of Jan 9, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.