Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116539
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorHao, ZHen_US
dc.creatorZeng, JJen_US
dc.creatorChen, GMen_US
dc.creatorDai, JGen_US
dc.creatorChen, JFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-05T03:58:30Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-05T03:58:30Z-
dc.identifier.isbn en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-0296en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116539-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectCFRPen_US
dc.subjectDurabilityen_US
dc.subjectFRP-to-concrete interfaceen_US
dc.subjectGFRPen_US
dc.subjectWet-dry cycling environmenten_US
dc.titleDurability of FRP-to-concrete bonded joints subjected to 110 months accelerated laboratory and field exposureen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage en_US
dc.identifier.epage en_US
dc.identifier.volume305en_US
dc.identifier.issue en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117681en_US
dcterms.abstractExternally bonded fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites have been widely used to strengthen existing reinforced concrete (RC) structures. The predominant failure mode in FRP-strengthened RC members is debonding, which is largely dependent on the performance of the FRP-to-concrete bond interface. The durability of FRP-to-concrete bond interfaces is therefore crucial to the safety of the strengthened structure. In this study, 84 FRP-to-concrete bonded joints were tested, with different types of FRP and adhesives, including carbon FRP (CFRP) plate with Sika30, CFRP plate with Araldite106, CFRP sheet with SW-3 C, and glass FRP (GFRP) sheet with Sika330. The performance of FRP-to-concrete bond interfaces and the corresponding materials (i.e., FRP, adhesives and concrete), were tested after 8 months, 18 months, 31 months, and 110 months exposure to the wet-dry cycling environment, and 48 months and 110 months exposure to the outdoor environment. The results show that the bonded joints subjected to the wet-dry cycling environment exhibited more significant degradation compared to those subjected to the outdoor environment. In the wet-dry cycling environment, the CFRP plate with Sika 30 and CFRP sheet with SW-3 C bonded joints exhibited better durability performance with only 3% and 9% reductions in bond strength after 110 months, respectively. In contrast, the CFRP plate with Araldite106 and GFRP sheet with Sika330 bonded joints exhibited larger reductions in bond strength of 36% and 48%, respectively. Furthermore, failure mode changes were observed as the exposure time increased.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEngineering structures, 15 Apr. 2024, v. 305, 117681en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEngineering structuresen_US
dcterms.issued2024-04-15-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85186542826-
dc.identifier.pmid -
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7323en_US
dc.identifier.artn117681en_US
dc.description.validate202512 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4237c-
dc.identifier.SubFormID52374-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe writers gratefully acknowledge that the present work presented has been financially supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong through General Research Fund (Project code: 516509), Theme-based Research Scheme (Project code: T22–502/18-R) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52178218, 52150710542). The first author would like to acknowledge the funding support for the Joint Ph.D. Scheme between Southern University of Science and Technology and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. The authors are also thankful to Prof. Jin-Guang Teng for his advice in planning the experimental program, and Prof. Xiaohui Wang and Mr. Dian-Yu Sun, for their assistance in the experimental work. The wet-dry cycling tests had been carried out in the structural lab and exposure site of Guangdong University of Technology (GDUT). Former postgraduate students of GDUT, Mr. Weinan Liu and Mr. Zhenkai Wu provided assistance in the experimental work.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-04-15en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-04-15
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.