Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116529
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorSelvaraj, SKen_US
dc.creatorChan, TMen_US
dc.creatorYoung, Ben_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-05T03:58:23Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-05T03:58:23Z-
dc.identifier.isbn en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-0296en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116529-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectBearing strengthen_US
dc.subjectBolted connectionsen_US
dc.subjectGeometric limitations for designen_US
dc.subjectPFRP platesen_US
dc.subjectStructural behaviouren_US
dc.titleDesign recommendations for multi-bolted staggered connections of PFRP structural membersen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage en_US
dc.identifier.epage en_US
dc.identifier.volume334en_US
dc.identifier.issue en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120162en_US
dcterms.abstractTowards the wider applicability of the Pultruded fibre-reinforced polymer (PFRP) structures, this study focused on developing an optimum connection geometry. PFRP multi-bolt staggered connection behaviour is investigated in this study. A total of sixty connection tests were carried out by varying the design parameters, such as the angle of loading, thickness of the PFRP plate, diameter of the bolts, and different patterns of staggered alignments. The test results are comprehensively analysed to determine the optimum connection geometry for achieving the bearing failure with progressive deformation. The appropriateness of the existing design standards for determining the bearing and shear-out strength of the bolted connections is verified. Based on the observations from the experimental results, minimum required bolt connection geometry dimensions are proposed. The comparison of test and design results shows that the strength predictions by design specifications CNR 2008, ASCE Pre-standard 2010, EU 2016, CEN/TC 19101, and FprCEN/TS 19101 are largely conservative but still not accurate. Therefore, suggestions to improve the design equations are proposed.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEngineering structures, 1 July 2025, v. 334, 120162en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEngineering structuresen_US
dcterms.issued2025-07-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105001573622-
dc.identifier.pmid -
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7323en_US
dc.identifier.artn120162en_US
dc.description.validate202512 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4237b-
dc.identifier.SubFormID52359-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe research work presented in this paper was supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China - Theme-based Research Scheme (Project No. T22–502/18-R). The authors would like to thank the Industrial Centre of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for facilitating the sample preparation and testing work.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-07-01en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-07-01
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.