Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116469
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorGao, Yen_US
dc.creatorLu, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-31T03:31:09Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-31T03:31:09Z-
dc.identifier.issn0011-9164en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116469-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectAir-conditioningen_US
dc.subjectEconomic analysisen_US
dc.subjectEnergy analysisen_US
dc.subjectExergy analysisen_US
dc.subjectLiquid desiccant regenerationen_US
dc.subjectMembrane distillationen_US
dc.subjectPerformance comparisonen_US
dc.titleComparative study on solar-driven combined liquid desiccant regeneration and freshwater production systems integrated with membrane distillation : energy, exergy, and economic analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume600en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.desal.2024.118476en_US
dcterms.abstractAs a water treatment technology combining thermal evaporation and membrane separation, membrane distillation (MD) holds promise for regenerating liquid desiccant and supplying drinking water simultaneously in hybrid air-conditioning systems. The present work aims to compare the potential of two commonly used compact MD configurations, direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) and air gap membrane distillation (AGMD), for liquid desiccant regeneration under various working conditions. Based on a thermodynamic model, the performance of two solar-driven MD systems are systematically evaluated and compared from an energetic, exergetic and economic perspective. The results show that the AGMD system is preferable at a low operating temperature or solution flow rate compared to the DCMD system in terms of regeneration capacity, energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, the AGMD system is found to be more competitive in handling highly saline desiccant than the DCMD system since the latter suffers from increasingly remarkable driving force reversal with the rise in concentration. As for the design parameter, the AGMD system exhibits an approximatively linear trend in regeneration capacity with extending membrane length, while for the DCMD system there exists an optimal membrane length at which it can yield the highest regeneration capacity. Additionally, the AGMD system outperforms the DCMD system regarding exergy destruction and exergy efficiency. The seasonal analysis indicates that the availability of DCMD system ranges between 60.7 % and 88.9 % during summer in Hong Kong, lower than that of the AGMD system owing to its less demand for thermal energy. These findings offer valuable insights into suitable selection of MD configurations employed in air-conditioning systems towards sustainable buildings.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDesalination, 1 May 2025, v. 600, 118476en_US
dcterms.isPartOfDesalinationen_US
dcterms.issued2025-05-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85213230784-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4464en_US
dc.identifier.artn118476en_US
dc.description.validate202512 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000602/2025-12-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe work described in this paper was partially supported by a grant from the NSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme sponsored by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. N_PolyU513/18).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-05-01en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-05-01
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.