Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116450
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorRingas, N-
dc.creatorLawson, RM-
dc.creatorFernando, D-
dc.creatorHuang, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-30T05:39:04Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-30T05:39:04Z-
dc.identifier.issn0263-8231-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116450-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectDiaphragm actionen_US
dc.subjectElastic theoryen_US
dc.subjectFixing behaviouren_US
dc.subjectLight gauge steelen_US
dc.subjectShear stiffnessen_US
dc.titleBehaviour and design of sheathed light gauge steel panels subjected to in-plane shear and gravity loadsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume218-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tws.2025.114047-
dcterms.abstractThe in-plane shear behaviour of sheathed light gauge steel wall panels is investigated by tests on 2.4 m square wall panels together with push-out tests, to determine the shear fixing stiffness and resistance. Parameters such as sheathing material, screw geometry, stud arrangement, adhesives, combined bracing with sheathing boards, and profiled sheeting were considered. An X-braced panel was used as a benchmark and to interpret the forces in the bracing obtained from measured strains. Wall panels with single C- and back-to-back C- sections in the middle of the panel have equivalent shear stiffness and resistance. The use of non-winged fixings can significantly enhance the stiffness of the panel due to increased thread engagement with the board material. Adhesives on the board-frame interface reduce damage evolution on the board material, while significantly increasing both stiffness and resistance. The tests also included the combination of X-bracing and sheathing boards to determine how their stiffnesses may be combined. It was also shown that profiled steel sheets serve as a potential alternative to X-bracing, although they require more fixings. The design approach based on elastic theory for the fixing properties obtained from push-out tests is in close agreement with the test results obtained from the representative wall panel tests, where the ratio of the recorded to the predicted panel shear stiffness and resistance have an average of 1.03 and 1.05, respectively, with a variation of up to 8 %.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationThin-walled structures, Jan. 2026, v. 218, pt. B, 114047-
dcterms.isPartOfThin-walled structures-
dcterms.issued2026-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105017857308-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-3223-
dc.identifier.artn114047-
dc.description.validate202512 bcel-
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000654/2025-11en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe authors would like to thank Newton Steel Framing for fabricating the specimens, the Shanghai Jiao Tong University-University of Edinburgh Low Carbon College Research Fund, the Royal Society/National Natural Science Foundation of China International Exchange grant (IEC/NSFC/223231), and the Steel Construction Institute for supporting this research project. Finally, the authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Mr Wojciech Plowas of Edinburgh Napier University in wall panel testing.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2028-01-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2028-01-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.