Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116450
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering | - |
| dc.creator | Ringas, N | - |
| dc.creator | Lawson, RM | - |
| dc.creator | Fernando, D | - |
| dc.creator | Huang, Y | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-30T05:39:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-30T05:39:04Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0263-8231 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116450 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Pergamon Press | en_US |
| dc.subject | Diaphragm action | en_US |
| dc.subject | Elastic theory | en_US |
| dc.subject | Fixing behaviour | en_US |
| dc.subject | Light gauge steel | en_US |
| dc.subject | Shear stiffness | en_US |
| dc.title | Behaviour and design of sheathed light gauge steel panels subjected to in-plane shear and gravity loads | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 218 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.tws.2025.114047 | - |
| dcterms.abstract | The in-plane shear behaviour of sheathed light gauge steel wall panels is investigated by tests on 2.4 m square wall panels together with push-out tests, to determine the shear fixing stiffness and resistance. Parameters such as sheathing material, screw geometry, stud arrangement, adhesives, combined bracing with sheathing boards, and profiled sheeting were considered. An X-braced panel was used as a benchmark and to interpret the forces in the bracing obtained from measured strains. Wall panels with single C- and back-to-back C- sections in the middle of the panel have equivalent shear stiffness and resistance. The use of non-winged fixings can significantly enhance the stiffness of the panel due to increased thread engagement with the board material. Adhesives on the board-frame interface reduce damage evolution on the board material, while significantly increasing both stiffness and resistance. The tests also included the combination of X-bracing and sheathing boards to determine how their stiffnesses may be combined. It was also shown that profiled steel sheets serve as a potential alternative to X-bracing, although they require more fixings. The design approach based on elastic theory for the fixing properties obtained from push-out tests is in close agreement with the test results obtained from the representative wall panel tests, where the ratio of the recorded to the predicted panel shear stiffness and resistance have an average of 1.03 and 1.05, respectively, with a variation of up to 8 %. | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | embargoed access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Thin-walled structures, Jan. 2026, v. 218, pt. B, 114047 | - |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Thin-walled structures | - |
| dcterms.issued | 2026-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105017857308 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-3223 | - |
| dc.identifier.artn | 114047 | - |
| dc.description.validate | 202512 bcel | - |
| dc.description.oa | Not applicable | en_US |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | G000654/2025-11 | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | The authors would like to thank Newton Steel Framing for fabricating the specimens, the Shanghai Jiao Tong University-University of Edinburgh Low Carbon College Research Fund, the Royal Society/National Natural Science Foundation of China International Exchange grant (IEC/NSFC/223231), and the Steel Construction Institute for supporting this research project. Finally, the authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Mr Wojciech Plowas of Edinburgh Napier University in wall panel testing. | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.date.embargo | 2028-01-31 | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



