Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116416
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Smart Energyen_US
dc.contributorMainland Development Officeen_US
dc.creatorZang, Xen_US
dc.creatorLi, Hen_US
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-23T07:41:03Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-23T07:41:03Z-
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116416-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectDemand-side flexibilityen_US
dc.subjectEnergy flexibility quantificationen_US
dc.subjectEnergy storageen_US
dc.subjectGrid servicesen_US
dc.subjectHVAC systemen_US
dc.subjectLevelized costen_US
dc.titleLevelized cost quantification of energy flexibility in high-density cities and evaluation of demand-side technologies for providing grid servicesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume211en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2024.115290en_US
dcterms.abstractToday, energy flexibility technologies at demand side have been increasingly used to provide energy flexibility services to power grids for enhancing their power balance and operation reliability. Various energy flexibility metrics have been proposed to assess the energy flexibility technologies in different applications and concerning different aspects, e.g., power and energy. However, an effective cost evaluation method is still lacking, particularly for applications at design and retrofit stages from the life cycle perspective, and for convenient comparison of different technologies. This study, therefore, proposes a novel cost evaluation index, namely levelized cost of energy flexibility. It is defined as the total cost per unit of energy flexibility capacity during the lifetime associated to a given technology. This index considers various operational constraints and cost items, especially from occupant-related perspectives. By using levelized cost of energy flexibility, the economic viabilities of six commonly used demand-side energy flexibility technologies are evaluated and compared for three typical grid services. The impacts of cost evolution and service activation requirements are also analyzed. Results show that the Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning system is the most cost-effective technology for all the grid services concerned. The significant cost reduction of vehicle-to-grid technology would make electric vehicles become the most cost-effective technology. This index could facilitate investors to prioritize the energy flexibility enhancement measures in applications.en_US
dcterms.abstractGraphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRenewable and sustainable energy reviews, Apr. 2025, v. 211, 115290en_US
dcterms.isPartOfRenewable and sustainable energy reviewsen_US
dcterms.issued2025-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85212857292-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0690en_US
dc.identifier.artn115290en_US
dc.description.validate202512 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000557/2025-12-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis work was supported by the General Research Fund (Grant number: No. 152201/22E) of the Research Grant Council (RGC) of the Hong Kong SAR; and the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (Grant number: KCXST20221021111203007).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-04-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-04-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
Citations as of Apr 3, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.