Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116365
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorChen, Den_US
dc.creatorYang, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-19T03:11:31Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-19T03:11:31Z-
dc.identifier.issn0308-8839en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116365-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.subjectEconomic policy uncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectGeopolitical risken_US
dc.subjectShipping freight marketen_US
dc.subjectVolatility spilloveren_US
dc.titleImpact of external uncertainties on internal volatility spillovers among shipping freight marketsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage327en_US
dc.identifier.epage350en_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03088839.2025.2511720en_US
dcterms.abstractGiven the unstable trading environment in past years, there is an urgent need to disentangle the relationship between internal spillovers across shipping freight markets and external uncertainties. This study addresses the issue using VAR-based approaches: First, Diebold-Yilmaz (DY) spillover indices are constructed for container, dry bulk, dirty, and clean tanker spot markets. Second, the Granger causal effects and shock effects from Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) and Geopolitical Risk (GPR) to the above spillover indices are examined. Special attention is given to the post-COVID-19 period in this study. Our results prove the epidemic has shifted the roles of net spillover transmitters and receivers within the four freight markets, while also intensifying the causality and shock impacts of EPU and GPR on internal spillovers. Additionally, the results reveal that EPU and GPR influence spillovers through distinct mechanisms, with tanker markets serving as key mediators that amplify uncertainty shocks. All of these findings convey significant policy implications to shipping stakeholders.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMaritime policy and management, 2026, v. 53, no. 3, p. 327-350en_US
dcterms.isPartOfMaritime policy and managementen_US
dcterms.issued2026-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105007156556-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-5254en_US
dc.description.validate202512 bcjzen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000513/2025-12-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe work described in this paper was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [Project No. PolyU15201722], National Natural Science Foundation of China [Project No. 42471215], and Zhejiang University-The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Joint Center.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-11-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-11-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.