Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116324
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorLei, T-
dc.creatorLiang, K-
dc.creatorXu, J-
dc.creatorLi, H-
dc.creatorSeo, JO-
dc.creatorHeung, H-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-16T02:45:13Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-16T02:45:13Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116324-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2025.en_US
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lei, T., Liang, K., Xu, J. et al. Effects on muscular activity and usability of soft active versus rigid passive back exoskeleton during symmetric lifting tasks. Sci Rep 15, 29839 (2025) is available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14500-3.en_US
dc.subjectBack exoskeletonen_US
dc.subjectConstruction healthen_US
dc.subjectExoskeleton comparisonen_US
dc.subjectLow back painen_US
dc.subjectPassive exoskeletonen_US
dc.subjectSoft active exosuiten_US
dc.titleEffects on muscular activity and usability of soft active versus rigid passive back exoskeleton during symmetric lifting tasksen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-025-14500-3-
dcterms.abstractLow back injuries are globally prevalent among construction workers, leading to significant economic burdens. Despite various intervention strategies, their effectiveness remains uncertain. This study evaluates a lightweight active soft back exosuit (SV Exosuit) against a passive rigid exosuit (IX BACK) to assess muscle activity and usability. Fifteen healthy participants performed bending and lifting tasks under three conditions: no exosuit, with SV Exosuit, and with IX BACK. Electromyographic (EMG) signals from back extensors were collected, and subjective feedback was obtained using the NASA task load index (NASA-TLX). Results showed that the active exosuit significantly reduced mean and peak EMG levels, while the passive exoskeleton exhibited modest reductions, particularly during unloaded tasks. EMG pattern analysis indicated peak activity occurring within 30–40% of the motion cycle, with IX BACK causing delays in bending without load due to resistance. Overall, both devices alleviated muscle strain, with SV Exosuit providing superior support during loaded tasks. The findings suggest that SV Exosuit’s lightweight and effective design make it a preferable option for construction tasks, highlighting the need for further research on its application in real-world settings.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationScientific reports, 14 Aug. 2025, v. 15, no. 1, 29839-
dcterms.isPartOfScientific reports-
dcterms.issued2025-08-14-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105013358218-
dc.identifier.pmid40813418-
dc.identifier.eissn2045-2322-
dc.identifier.artn29839-
dc.description.validate202512 bcjz-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000478/2025-09en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe authors acknowledged Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Macau S&T Program (Category C) (Grant No. SGDX20201103095203031), Hong Kong Chief Executive’s Policy Unit Public Policy Research Funding Scheme (PPRFS, Grant No. 2023.A6.242.23C), and internal funds from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for funding this research.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.