Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116307
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorQiao, Ren_US
dc.creatorSun, Yen_US
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.creatorLan, Ben_US
dc.creatorChung, CYen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-15T09:38:52Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-15T09:38:52Z-
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116307-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectLeftover spaceen_US
dc.subjectUrban revitalizationen_US
dc.subjectTypologyen_US
dc.subjectRight to the cityen_US
dc.subjectUrban renewalen_US
dc.titleTypology-driven framework for revitalizing urban leftover spaces : systematic review of practices and future research directionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume158en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107721en_US
dcterms.abstractThe rapid pace of urbanization has resulted in many leftover spaces in cities globally. These spaces come in various types and present shortcomings on multiple facets, which simultaneously provide unique advantages for diverse social groups for different activities and purposes. To harness these spaces’ potential and reinforce citizens’ rights to the city, urban planners have proposed several revitalization strategies. This study performs a systematic literature review of 114 peer-reviewed articles, sourced from prominent academic databases, focusing on “leftover space” and “residual space” as primary search terms. We identified four common types of leftover space based on their value deficiencies, thereby creating a framework for revitalization. First, locational leftover spaces can benefit from landscape enhancements. Second, heritage leftover spaces may be revitalized through land remediation and the adaptive reuse of industrial heritage. Third, morphological leftover spaces can be optimized by planning adjustments creating public spaces. Lastly, functional leftover spaces can be energized through place-making initiatives promoting community involvement. This research aligns various leftover spaces with revitalization strategies on policy, funding, schemes, and maintenance, thereby providing insights for future research and guides evidence-based planning practices in the long run.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLand use policy, Nov. 2025, v. 158, 107721en_US
dcterms.isPartOfLand use policyen_US
dcterms.issued2025-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105013668860-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5754en_US
dc.identifier.artn107721en_US
dc.description.validate202512 bcjzen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000473/2025-09-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe work described in this paper was partially supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. PolyU 15616724). The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments in improving the early draft of the manuscript.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2028-11-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2028-11-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.