Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116305
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communication-
dc.creatorWang, Y-
dc.creatorFeng, D-
dc.creatorBao, J-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-15T09:12:43Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-15T09:12:43Z-
dc.identifier.issn0256-0046-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116305-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.subjectCarbon-neutral documentariesen_US
dc.subjectChinese cultureen_US
dc.subjectClimate changeen_US
dc.subjectMultimodal analysisen_US
dc.subjectSustainable Chinaen_US
dc.titleHarmony, low-carbon economy, and the construction of a sustainable China image : a multimodal analysis of Chinese carbon-neutral documentariesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02560046.2025.2526033-
dcterms.abstractIn recent years, climate sustainability has emerged as a cornerstone of China’s domestic economic strategy and a defining element of its vision for global environmental leadership. Against this backdrop, this study investigates how China constructs its sustainable national image through three carbon-neutral documentaries targeted at a global audience. Drawing upon Martin and White’s (2005) Attitude System and Kress and van Leeuwen’s (2006) Visual Grammar, the study develops an explicit framework to investigate how a sustainable China image is constructed in Chinese ecological discourse. The analysis reveals that these documentaries portray a sustainable country image through: (1) highlighting the unity of economic development and environmental protection, (2) presenting technological innovations as the ultimate solution for tackling climate change, and (3) emphasising a focus on people-centeredness and public well-being. The findings reveal a “harmosophy” model rooted in Confucian-Daoist thought, emphasising metaphysical, moral, and social harmony. This cultural orientation, combined with economic pragmatism and techno-nationalism, shapes a distinctly Chinese ecological discourse.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCritical arts, Published online: 17 July 2025, Latest Articles, https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2025.2526033-
dcterms.isPartOfCritical arts-
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105010869729-
dc.identifier.eissn1992-6049-
dc.description.validate202512 bcjz-
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000462/2025-08en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.date.embargo2027-01-17en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-01-17
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.