Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116127
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorLi, Cen_US
dc.creatorCariou, Pen_US
dc.creatorYang, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-24T07:44:46Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-24T07:44:46Z-
dc.identifier.issn0967-070Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116127-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectContainer portsen_US
dc.subjectEmission abatement policyen_US
dc.subjectGeopolitical risksen_US
dc.subjectPort carbon emissionsen_US
dc.titleGeopolitical risks and port-related carbon emissions : evidence and policy implicationsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume173en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103809en_US
dcterms.abstractGeopolitical risks (GPR) have emerged as a critical source of disruption in global trade and transportation systems, yet their environmental consequences on port-related emissions remain underexplored. This study examines the impact of geopolitical tensions on port-level carbon emissions using a monthly panel dataset covering 269 container ports across 40 countries and regions from 2016 to 2023. Employing a system generalized method of moments (SYS-GMM) estimator, we find that heightened geopolitical risks significantly increase carbon emissions at ports. A key mechanism underlying this relationship is that geopolitical tensions disrupt the vessel arrival schedules, which reduces port efficiency, and consequently increases emissions from ships at berth. Further heterogeneity analyses reveal that the environmental impact of GPR is more pronounced at ports serving larger container vessels, as these ports are typically involved in long-haul routes that are more exposed to geopolitical disruptions. In contrast, the impact is less significant at ports with fewer calling carriers, likely because dominant shipping lines tend to internalize the costs of inefficient berthing by smoothing vessel arrival times. This study provides novel empirical evidence on the environmental consequences of geopolitical shocks in the maritime sector, offering actionable policy insights for risk-sensitive and sustainable port governance.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransport policy, Nov. 2025, v. 173, 103809en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTransport policyen_US
dcterms.issued2025-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105015365731-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-310Xen_US
dc.identifier.artn103809en_US
dc.description.validate202511 bcjzen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000381/2025-10-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe work described in this paper was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. PolyU15201722 ), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number Research 42471215 ), and Zhejiang University-The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Joint Center .en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-11-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-11-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.