Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116118
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Smart Ageingen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Food Science and Nutritionen_US
dc.creatorLiu, JZen_US
dc.creatorLiao, MQen_US
dc.creatorZheng, Len_US
dc.creatorLi, HRen_US
dc.creatorSu, Xen_US
dc.creatorFeng, YHen_US
dc.creatorQiu, JMen_US
dc.creatorZhang, SWen_US
dc.creatorCai, Jen_US
dc.creatorChen, SYen_US
dc.creatorHuang, SQen_US
dc.creatorHuang, HKen_US
dc.creatorYe, YBen_US
dc.creatorHan, SSen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Sen_US
dc.creatorLu, DLen_US
dc.creatorLo, Ken_US
dc.creatorZeng, FFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-24T00:45:15Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-24T00:45:15Z-
dc.identifier.issn0002-9165en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116118-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBreastfeedingen_US
dc.subjectChilden_US
dc.subjectMaternalen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectUmbrella reviewen_US
dc.titleAssociations of breastfeeding with maternal and child health outcomes : umbrella reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationTitle on author’s file: Effects of breastfeeding on maternal and child health outcomes : umbrella reviewen_US
dc.identifier.spage1061en_US
dc.identifier.epage1074en_US
dc.identifier.volume122en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.07.027en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: Breastfeeding (BF) has been reported to be beneficial for both mothers and their offspring, but the evidence for these associations has not been systematically evaluated.en_US
dcterms.abstractObjectives: This umbrella review aims to assess the credibility of existing evidence regarding the associations between BF and health outcomes in mothers and offspring.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: For each health outcome, evidence levels were determined using reanalyzed random-effects estimates, between-study heterogeneity, 95% predictive intervals, publication bias, small-study effects, and excess significance bias. Methodological quality was assessed by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2, and evidence credibility was graded with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: Overall, 192 meta-analyses from 62 articles were included. Among maternal outcomes, 3 meta-analyses (3/65, 4.6%) were considered to provide convincing evidence that BF reduced risks of ovarian cancer [odds ratio (OR) range: 0.70–0.78] and hypertension (OR range: 0.89–0.93). For short-term offspring outcomes, 5 meta-analyses (5/114, 4.4%) were considered to provide convincing evidence that exclusive BF or ever BF was associated with lower risks of sudden infant death syndrome [OR: 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54, 0.73] and allergic rhinitis (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.70), alongside improved physical fitness (standing long jump, standardized mean differences: 0.20–0.27). Early BF initiation (<1 h after birth) reduced neonatal mortality risk by 56% (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.61). Regarding long-term offspring outcomes, 2 meta-analyses (2/13, 15.4%) were considered to offer highly suggestive and suggestive evidence, respectively, suggesting the inverse associations of ever BF on overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in adulthood. After GRADE credibility assessment, only 4 of 192 meta-analyses were classified as moderate-quality evidence.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: Our findings support the benefits of BF for mothers and their offspring, underscoring the importance of promoting BF practices to improve maternal and child health outcomes.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationThe American journal of clinical nutrition, Oct. 2025, v. 122, no. 4, p. 1061-1074en_US
dcterms.isPartOfThe American journal of clinical nutritionen_US
dcterms.issued2025-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105014606035-
dc.identifier.pmid40754214-
dc.identifier.eissn1938-3207en_US
dc.description.validate202511 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000371/2025-10-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis study was jointly supported by the GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81602853). The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-10-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-10-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.